No abstract

Over the 20 years since Thompson and Pleck's review of masculinity measures, much has changed with respect to measurement of masculinity ideologies. In this review, we examine the theoretical foundations and psychometric properties of measures of masculinity ideologies. We frame the review with a brief discussion of the 2 distinct conceptualizations of masculinity ideologies, then provide a synopsis of the 16 measures that meet our selection criteria: have been used in empirical studies since 1995, were published in peer-reviewed psychology or gender-related journals, contain full presentation of psychometric properties, are not study-specific modifications of earlier scales, and focus directly or indirectly on masculinity ideologies. We show that there are now 2 generations of measures. The 1st focuses on the hegemonic, traditional masculinity ideologies in North America. The 2nd-generation theorizes local masculinities and explicitly recognizes that different groups of individuals hold different standards. These have begun to map the geography of masculinities for men of different birth cohorts, life stages, social classes, sexual orientations, cultures, and racial/ethnic communities. We conclude by suggesting that there is value for a 3rd generation of measures to capture the changing face of men's gendered lives.

No abstract

Disease progression in multiple sclerosis occurs within the interface of glial activation and gliosis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between biomarkers of different glial cell responses: (i) to disease dynamics and the clinical subtypes of multiple sclerosis; (ii) to disability; and (iii) to cross-validate these findings in a post-mortem study. To address the first goal, 51 patients with multiple sclerosis [20 relapsing remitting (RR), 21 secondary progressive (SP) and 10 primary progressive (PP)] and 51 neurological control patients were included. Disability was assessed using the ambulation index (AI), the Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS) and the 9-hole PEG test (9HPT). Patients underwent lumbar puncture within 7 days of clinical assessment. Post-mortem brain tissue (12 multiple sclerosis and eight control patients) was classified histologically and adjacent sites were homogenized for protein analysis. S100B, ferritin and glial-fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were quantified in CSF and brain-tissue homogenate by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) techniques developed in-house. There was a significant trend for increasing S100B levels from PP to SP to RR multiple sclerosis (P < 0.05). S100B was significantly higher in RR multiple sclerosis than in control patients (P < 0.01), whilst ferritin levels were significantly higher in SP multiple sclerosis than in control patients (P < 0.01). The S100B : ferritin ratio discriminated patients with RR multiple sclerosis from SP, PP or control patients (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Multiple sclerosis patients with poor ambulation (AI > or =7) or severe disability (EDSS >6.5) had significantly higher CSF GFAP levels than less disabled multiple sclerosis or control patients (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was a correlation between GFAP levels and ambulation in SP multiple sclerosis (r = 0.57, P < 0.01), and between S100B level and the 9HPT in PP multiple sclerosis patients (r = -0.85, P < 0.01). The post-mortem study showed significantly higher S100B levels in the acute than in the subacute plaques (P < 0.01), whilst ferritin levels were elevated in all multiple sclerosis lesion stages. Both GFAP and S100B levels were significantly higher in the cortex of multiple sclerosis than in control brain homogenate (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). We found that S100B is a good marker for the relapsing phase of the disease (confirmed by post-mortem observation) as opposed to ferritin, which is elevated throughout the entire course. GFAP correlated with disability scales and may therefore be a marker for irreversible damage. The results of this study have broad implications for finding new and sensitive outcome measures for treatment trials that aim to delay the development of disability. They may also be considered in future classifications of multiple sclerosis patients.

No abstract