solid electrolyte interphase. On the other hand, increasing the surface area shortens the length of Li-ion diffusion pathways and decreases the Ohmic drop within the material. The mechanism and properties of Li-ion (de-)intercalation for TiO 2 was shown to be dependent on the particle size for some materials. [ 7,8 ] It was proposed that both Li-rich and Li-poor phases cannot co-exist within one TiO 2 particle for particle sizes below a certain value, [ 7 ] which could infl uence the potential memory effect. These facts suggest the question: If the memory effect could be one of those particle size dependent properties?Here, we reveal the presence of a memory effect in anatase TiO 2 , showing that other active materials, beside LiFePO 4 , may suffer from a memory effect in LIBs. We also demonstrate that the memory effect in anatase TiO 2 is dependent on the specifi c surface area. Namely, increasing the surface area of the TiO 2 material leads to a decrease in the memory effect, which is practically disappearing for the particles with a very high specifi c surface area (300 m 2 g −1 ).We prepared seven samples of anatase TiO 2 with different specifi c surface areas (referred to as TiO 2 _ X , where X is the specifi c surface area of 10, 60, 95, 130, 180, 240, and 300 m 2 g −1 ). The values of the specifi c surface area were obtained by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method and the anatase phase was confi rmed for all samples by X-ray diffraction (Supporting Information Figure S1). For the evaluation of the memory effect in these samples, we followed the electrochemical procedure as suggested by Sasaki et al., [ 5 ] which consists of applying three subsequent cycles: a normal (de-)intercalation cycle, a memory writing cycle and a memory releasing cycle ( Figure 1 a). During the memory writing cycle, the oxidation process was interrupted at a certain SOC. In the next memory releasing step the sample was cycled within the normal potential range, i.e., 3 V to 1 V in our case, and the memory effect was revealed if occurred. For all examined materials, the memory effect was observed in the memory releasing cycle. It appeared as a bump in the plateau on Li-ion de-intercalation occurring at a similar SOC at which the memory writing cycle was stopped (Figure 1 b,c) similarly as in case of LiFePO 4 . [ 5 ] Here, we defi ne the magnitude of the memory effect as a difference (in mV) between the potential of the maximum of the memory effect bump and the potential at that SOC during the normal cycle (Figure 1 a). Figure 1 presents the data for TiO 2 _95 cycled at C/3 rate, but similar behavior was observed for each examined sample (Supporting Information Figure S2a-f).It is known that the two phases do not coexist within one particle during the phase transformation for some of the materials with very small particles. [ 7 ] Instead, they "switch" spontaneously from one phase to another when the critical Li-ions content is reached and this transformation takes place at once within the entire particle. The phase transformation results...