A key for the interpretation of porous lithium ion battery electrode impedance spectra is a meaningful and physically motivated equivalent-circuit model. In this work we present a novel approach, utilizing a general transmission line equivalent-circuit model to exemplarily analyze the impedance of a porous high-voltage LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) cathode. It is based on a LNMO/graphite full-cell setup equipped with a gold wire micro-reference electrode (GWRE) to obtain impedance spectra in both, non-blocking conditions at a potential of 4.4 V cell voltage and in blocking configuration achieved at 4.9 V cell voltage. A simultaneous fitting of both spectra enables the deconvolution of physical effects to quantify over the course of 85 cycles at 40 • C: a) the true charge transfer resistance (R CT ), b) the pore resistance (R Pore ), and c) the contact resistance (R Cont. ). We demonstrate that the charge transfer resistance would be overestimated significantly, if the spectra are fitted with a conventionally used simplified R/Q equivalent-circuit compared to our full transmission line analysis. Advanced analysis techniques for lithium ion batteries are a key requirement to deconvolute the complex interplay between the aging mechanisms occurring at the anode and the cathode. In principle, this can be accomplished by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), if the individual contributions of anode and cathode to the overall cell impedance can be determined, and if this EIS response can be fitted unambiguously to physically motivated equivalent-circuit models. In general, the measured cell and/or electrode impedances are usually fitted with a serial connection of an ohmic resistor (R), with a parallel circuit of a resistor and a capacitor (C), commonly referred to as R/C element and often also modified to an R/Q element (Q representing a constant-phase element), as well as with a Warburg element (W). [1][2][3][4][5] Recently, more elaborate equivalentcircuits using a transmission line model are getting more and more attention. [6][7][8] In order to independently obtain the impedance of anode and cathode, there are two possible options: i) the assembly of symmetric cells as shown by Chen et al. 9 or Petibon et al., 10 where coin cells out of two anodes (impedance of the negative electrode) or two cathodes (impedance of the positive electrode) are assembled in a glove box or dry-room from two (aged) full-cells at a specified state-of-charge (SOC); ii) the use of three-electrode setups consisting of a working electrode (WE), a counter electrode (CE) and a reference electrode (RE), which allows to individually determine the impedance of the anode and the cathode of a lithium ion battery full-cell. The latter is a more convenient approach, as individual impedance spectra can be recorded continuously during battery cycling, so that anode and cathode impedance can be monitored during cycle-life studies on a fullcell instead of obtaining only one set of anode and cathode impedance spectra after disassembly of a full-cell...