No abstract

We examined the pancreatic tissue concentrations of cefazolin in ten patients undergoing pancreatectomy, and determined the optimal intraoperative time to deliver a repeat dose of cefazolin. An intravenous bolus dose of 1 g cefazolin was administered at the time of skin incision. Peripheral blood, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and peritoneal samples were obtained intraoperatively every hour for 4 h after the antibiotic was first administered, and pancreatic tissue samples were obtained at the time of pancreatectomy. To determine adequate tissue levels of cefazolin, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were measured for four bacterial species, namely 360 isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 204 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 314 isolates of Escherichia coli, and 30 isolates of Streptococcus spp. The antibiotic concentrations in adipose tissue and peritoneum 3 h after the administration of cefazolin were lower than the MIC80 for K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and Streptococcus spp. Most pancreatic tissue samples showed antibiotic concentrations greater than the MIC80 for these bacterial species; however, those from four patients complicated by severe chronic pancreatitis, massive intraoperative bleeding, or obesity showed concentrations lower than the MIC80. Thus, we recommend that a second dose of cefazolin be given 3 h after the first administration to maintain adequate levels of antibiotic activity.

No abstract

Pancreatic ascites can occur in association with the rupture of a pseudocyst or the disruption of a pancreatic duct during the natural course of chronic pancreatitis. We report herein the successful treatment of three patients with pancreatic ascites by performing a surgical procedure after 4-6 weeks of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) proved ineffective. The principles of our surgical procedure for pancreatic ascites are as follows: (1) minimum pancreatic tissue is resected; (2) surgical intervention to repair leaking sites is not necessary; (3) pancreatic duct drainage is facilitated by an intestinal Roux-en-Y loop; (4) An external drainage tube is inserted through the Roux-en-Y loop into the main pancreatic duct. All three patients who underwent our surgical procedure had a good outcome. Although the mean follow-up time is still only 18.3 months, their condition has improved, with no evidence of recurrent ascites. Thus, our surgical procedure should be considered as an appropriate treatment for pancreatic ascites because it can be applied for all types of leakage, including leakage from the posterior wall of pancreas; it preserves pancreatic function, especially endocrine function; and it enables preservation of the spleen.

No abstract