Out of hours (OOH) doctors can have an important gate-keeping role over the access to the emergency department (ED), but the outcome and the quality of their ED referrals have been poorly studied. We aimed to investigate the outcome of patients referred to ED from OOH service and the determinants of admission or short-stay dispositions. We collected retrospectively data about referrals to ED from a local OOH service in the north-east of Italy using the OOH paper register and the ED electronic database, over the period of 01/10/2012 to 31/03/2013. Out of 5217 patients accessing the OOH service, 408 referrals were included in our analysis. 45.3% (185) of the referrals were admitted to hospital or the short-stay unit, 26 patients (=6.4%) were discharged as non-urgent outgoing codes after no specialist consultation or test, suggesting inappropriate referrals, and, of the remaining 197 (=48%), only 10 did not undergo any investigation or consultation. Significant determinants of admission were: age ≥65 years (OR = 2.619; 95% CI 1.528-4.491, p < 0.0001), domiciliary examination (OR = 2.168; 95% CI 1.353-3.476, p = 0.001), nursing home/palliative care setting (OR = 2.563; 95% CI 1.228-5.351, p = 0.012) and OOH triage code, ranging from an OR of 7.47 (95% CI 3.028-18.433) for minor urgencies to an OR of 26.835 (95% CI 6.761-106.508, p < 0.0001) for emergencies, in comparison to no urgent codes. OOH service seems to play an effective gate-keeping role limiting ED access. Determinants of admission to hospital suggest some simple interventions that could improve the adequacy of ED referral from OOH service.

No abstract

Aim The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) seems widespread in adults and children, despite the conflicting evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of the use of CAM in a population of Italian children. Methods This is a prospective observational study conducted in 4 family paediatric clinics, in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy, from February to June 2019. Children were enrolled after being visited. The use of CAM and essential therapies (ET) in the previous year was investigated with an anonymous questionnaire. The demographic characteristics of children and families were also collected. Results Six hundred children were enrolled, mean age 5.8 years, 50% females. In the previous year, 358 (60%) children used both essential therapies and CAM, 209 children (35%) only essential therapies, 25 (4%) only CAM, and 8 (1%) no therapy. CAM was more frequently used in children whose parents have a higher educational level and come from high‐income countries (P < .0001). Non‐vaccinated children received more CAM than vaccinated ones (P < .003). Conclusion In our population, more than 60% of children receive CAM. The use of this medical approach seems strictly related to the social and cultural status of families.

No abstract

No abstract