People suffering from food allergies are dependent on accurate food labeling, as an avoidance diet is the only effective countermeasure. Even a small amount of allergenic protein can trigger severe reactions in highly sensitized patients. Therefore, sensitive and reliable tests are needed to detect potential cross-contamination. In this paper two fast sandwich immunoassays are described for the determination of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana) traces in complex food matrices. Mouse monoclonal antibodies were used as capture antibodies, and labeled rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used as detection antibodies in both assays. The assay time was 30 min in total, and cross-reactivities against a variety of fruits and seeds were found to be in the low 10(-4)% (ppm) level or in some cases not detectable. The recoveries in all tested food matrices ranged from 86 to 127%, and the limits of detection were in the range of 0.2-1.2 mg/kg (ppm) in food for both peanut and hazelnut, respectively.

No abstract

Thirteen European laboratories experienced in the analysis of mycotoxins participated in an intercomparison study within a European Commission-funded project. Goals of the study were to check the fitness for purpose of a small batch of gravimetrically prepared calibrants; to compare individually prepared calibrants with common calibrants; to check the feasibility of toxin mixtures as calibrant solutions; and to give recommendations on the production of future certified reference materials (CRMs) with regard to the nature of the calibrant and the means of certification. Each laboratory received ampules of each common calibrant containing single toxins [solution containing either deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), nivalenol (NIV), or 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON)] and 3 ampules of toxinmixture (solutions of DON 3-Ac-DON NIV in acetonitrile) of known concentrations (about 20 g/mL). Ampules with single toxins (solution containing either DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, or 15-Ac-DON) and a toxinmixture (solutions of DON 3-Ac-DON NIV in acetonitrile) of unknown concentrations were distributed to the participants for quantification. The participating laboratories used mainly high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)diode array detection UV for DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, and 15-Ac-DON; gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) and GC-mass spectrometry methods were used sparingly. Linear calibration curves were achieved by >90% of the participants. Relative between-day variation (RSDr) of 26% of the laboratories was greater than the target value of 5% for HPLC, and RSDr of 32% of the laboratories was greater than the desired value of 10% for GC. Relative between-laboratory variation (RSDR) of the GC results obtained with single common calibrants was greater than the target value of 16% for all laboratories. RSDR of the HPLC results for the common unknown single toxin solutions was less than the target value of 8% except for 15-Ac-DON. Generally, better recoveries were observed from common calibrants (102% for mix calibrants and 98% for single calibrants) than from individually prepared calibrants (95%). This international comparison study clearly showed the high scattering of results in the analysis of type-B trichothecenes, particularly when GC was used. Obviously, this intercomparison study was not suited for the certification of B-trichothecenes. A certification of the proposed calibrant material was therefore recommended on the basis of its gravimetrical preparation.

Within the EC-financed project "Feasibility Study for the Production of Certified Calibrants for the Determination of Deoxynivalenol and other B-Trichothecenes", an intercomparison study was performed with 13 European participants.Main goals of the intercomparison study were to check the feasibility of a small batch of gravimetrically prepared calibrants, to directly compare common and individually prepared calibrants, to test the practicability of toxin mixtures as calibrant solutions and finally to give recommendations for the means of certification. Additionally, it focused on the comparison of gas chromatography (GC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of pure type-B trichothecene solutions, which is described in this publication.The participating laboratories received calibrant solutions as well as toxin solutions of unknown concentration and employed mainly HPLC-UV; GC-ECD (electron capture detection) and GC-MS (mass spectrometry) methods were used less often.The intercomparison study generally suffered from a high rate of outliers (22% of all the data). Throughout the study, 48% of all GC results were classified as outliers and it soon became apparent, that GC results highly infuenced the outcome of the study and that the used GC methods were not robust enough for the certification of type-B trichothecene calibrants. The high discrepancy between HPLC and GC results in the intercomparison study presumably lies in the crucial step of derivatisation.

Purification of peanut proteins for further use in affinity chromatography and as immunogensChickens were immunised with peanut protein extracts. Because of the high cross reactivity, the lgY antibodies were purified by means of an affinity column. An ion chromatographically purified peanut protein fraction was therefore coupled to the affinity support material and this column was used for further lgY purification.