Nanomaterials are increasingly used in a wide range of products, leading to growing concern of their environmental fate. In order to understand the fate and effects of silver nanoparticles in the soil environment, a suite of toxicity tests including: plant growth with Elymus lanceolatus (northern wheatgrass) and Trifolium pratense (red clover); collembolan survival and reproduction (Folsomia candida); and earthworm avoidance, survival and reproduction (Eisenia andrei) was conducted. The effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) was compared with the effect of ionic silver (as AgNO3) in two agricultural field soils (a sandy loam and a silt loam). Lethal (LC50) or sub lethal (IC50) effect levels are presented for all endpoints and demonstrate that in most cases AgNO3 (i.e. ionic silver) was found to be more toxic than the AgNP across test species. The difference in effects observed between the two forms of silver varied based on test species, endpoint and soil type. In tests that were conducted across different soil types, organisms in the sandier soil had a greater response to the Ag (ionic and nano) than those in soil with a high silt content. Earthworms (avoidance behavior and reproduction) were the most sensitive to both AgNP and AgNO3, while plant emergence was the least sensitive endpoint to both forms of Ag. The use of a test battery approach using natural field soils demonstrates the need to better quantify the dissolution and transformation products of nanomaterials in order to understand the fate and effects of these materials in the soil environment.

No abstract

The use of neonicotinoids in agriculture is a critical environmental protection issue. Although there has been considerable research on pollinator exposure and aquatic toxicological effects, few studies have investigated the chronic impacts on soil‐dwelling species. Given the application of neonicotinoids into soil systems, there is the potential for risk to soil invertebrates. The toxicity of 2 commercial formulations containing the active ingredients (a.i.) thiamethoxam (Actara® 240SC) or clothianidin (Titan™) was investigated using 3 soil invertebrate species: Oppia nitens, Eisenia andrei, and Folsomia candida. No adverse effects were observed for O. nitens at the highest tested concentrations (≥92 mg a.i./kg dry soil) after a 28‐d exposure. Exposure to clothianidin resulted in a 28‐d median inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.069 (95% confidence limits: 0.039–0.12) mg/kg dry soil for F. candida, and a 56‐d IC50 of 0.26 (0.22–3.2) mg a.i./kg dry soil for E. andrei. Exposure to thiamethoxam was less toxic, with IC50s of 0.36 (0.19–0.66) and 3.0 (2.2–4.0) mg a.i./kg dry soil for F. candida and E. andrei reproduction, respectively. The observed toxicity for F. candida adult survival and reproduction and for E. andrei reproduction occurred at environmentally relevant concentrations. However, because clothianidin is a degradation product of thiamethoxam, and detection of clothianidin rose to levels of concern in the thiamethoxam‐amended soils over time, the observed toxicity may be partly attributed to the presence of clothianidin. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2111–2120. © 2019 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

No abstract

Within Canada, screening-level assessments for chemical substances are required to determine whether the substances pose a risk to human health and/or the environment, and as appropriate, risk management strategies. In response to the volume of metal and metal-containing substances, process efficiencies were introduced using a metal-moiety approach, whereby substances that contain a common metal moiety are assessed simultaneously as a group, with the moiety of concern consisting of the metal ion. However, for certain subgroups, such as organometals or organic metal salts, the organic moiety or parent substance may be of concern, rather than simply the metal ion. To further investigate the need for such additional consideration, certain substances were evaluated: zinc (Zn)-containing inorganic (Zn chloride [ZnCl2] and Zn oxide) and organic (organometal: Zn diethyldithiocarbamate [Zn(DDC) ] and organic metal salts (Zn stearate [ZnSt] and 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzenediazonium tetrachlorozincate [BCNZ]). The toxicity of the substances were assessed using plant (Trifolium pratense and Elymus lanceolatus) and soil invertebrate (Folsomia candida and Eisenia andrei) tests in a sandy soil. Effect measures were determined based on total metal and total parent analyses (for organic substances). In general, the inorganic Zn substances were less toxic than the organometals and organic metal salts, with 50% effective concentrations ranging from 11 to >5194 mg Zn kg dry soil. The data demonstrate the necessity for alternate approaches in the assessment of organo-metal complexes, with the organic moieties or parent substances warranting consideration rather than the metal ion alone. In this instance, the organometals and organic metal salts were significantly more toxic than other test substances despite their low total Zn content. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:3324-3332. © 2017 Crown in the Right of Canada. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC.