Based on a case study on the construction of the Semarang-Demak Toll Road, this study aims to investigate and investigate land acquisition for the public interest for land that has been destroyed as a result of natural events and its legal certainty. The research method used is socio-legal with primary data in identification, field measurements, and other supporting data. Semarang-Demak Toll Road property acquisition demonstrated tidal inundation on the north shore. Subsidence exacerbates Semarang's flooding. On flooded land, sea dikes and retention ponds prevent tidal floods. If just for transportation, the Semarang-Demak Toll Road can be built in flood-free areas or over the sea, like Bali's Mandra Toll Road. Land acquisition concerns delayed the Semarang-Demak Toll Road. Lack of land limitations has delayed land purchases. In the Semarang-Demak Toll Road land acquisition, destroyed land is not a problem under Indonesian law. 2021's Regulation 18 defines destroyed land. Destroyed land will drive people to take better care of their land and be more concerned about global warming or land subsidence. The state honors the landowner's emotional connection by paying for spiritual care. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-06-06 Full Text: PDF

Indonesia and Japan regulate compensation for damaged land differently, especially in land expropriation process. This article aims to compare compensation concept of damaged land in Indonesia and Japan to get better understanding of the differences, similarities, and consequences. Using qualitative descriptive approach, rules and regulations that apply in Indonesia and Japan are compered. Land acquisition for development for the public interest is regulated by Law Number 2 of 2012. In land expropriation, the state provides appropriate compensation for the parties involved. In context of land acquisition, there is no compensation for damaged land. Law Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management mandates the government to oversee disaster management that accommodate compensation for damaged land due to natural disaster. In Japan, land expropriation will not happen unless landowners are appropriately compensated. Regarding compensation value, Japan has superior regulations compared to Indonesia. Japan uses consensus to determined compensation while Indonesia uses single value determined by public appraisal. However, Indonesia has special regulations for damaged land. Therefore, if damaged land is used for the public interest, landowners will not receive compensation through land acquisition procedures but rather through disaster management procedures.

Land is a livelihood land for everyone to achieve prosperity in various fields; besides that, the land is also the essential capital in the development of a nation, and its benefits must be exploited as well as possible. There are still many lands affected by the procurement of development for the public interest that are detrimental to the community, including compensation and land that an appraisal has not appraised. This research method uses normative juridical research with the approach of laws and concepts and collects primary legal materials in existing regulations in both countries. Data collection techniques consist of literature study, observation, interviews, and use of questionnaires. The results of this study found that both Indonesia and Malaysia regulate compensation arrangements in the Act. Although both of them depart from different legal systems, where Indonesia is subject to the civil law system and Malaysia is subject to the common law system, both have the same. In Indonesia, it has not explicitly regulated reappraisal in its law, in the future, it is necessary to consider the pattern of reappraisal carried out by Malaysia, because this pattern according to the author, with the current legal vacuum, it is necessary to have a fast track process to provide justice and legal certainty.

<p>Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis politik hukum terhadap pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum atas tanah abrasi pasca hadirnya undang-undang yang memuat peraturan tentang cipta kerja. Berbagai macam pendekatan seperti pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual menjadi instrument pada jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yang digunakan sebagai metode dalam penelitian ini. Penemuan dari hasil penelitian yang dilakukan bahwa telah ditambahkan kepentingan umum seperti halnya termaktub dalam pasal yang mengatur tentang pengadaan tanah sebanyak 6 (enam) kegiatan meliputi kawasan industri, ekonomi khusus, pariwisata, ketahanan pangan, industri gas, industri minyak, dan pengembangan teknologi. Hapusnya hak atas tanah karena tanah musnah bersamaan dengan pemberian kesempatan kepada pemegang kuasa atas tanah untuk perlu membangun kembali dan merevitalisasi atas pendayagunaan tanah dan diatur di dalamnya tentang pihak lain yang dapat melakukan rekonstruksi dan revitalisasi berdasarkan pemberian dana kerohiman pada kuasa atas tanah atau kuasa pendayagunaan. Adanya perubahan-perubahan tersebut diatas akan menjadi sebuah langkah lebih dekat demi terwujudnya keadilan, kesejahteraan dan kemakmuran dalam pemberian kompensasi terhadap tanah musnah.</p><p> </p><p>The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal politics of development in the public interest on abraded land after the presence of a law that contains regulations on work creation. Various approaches, such as the statutory and conceptual approach, become instruments for the type of normative juridical research that is used as a method in this research. The findings from the results of research conducted that public interest has been added as stated in the article that regulates land procurement as many as 6 (six) activities covering industrial areas, special economy, tourism, food security, gas industry, oil industry, and technology development. The abolition of land rights because the land is destroyed simultaneously with the opportunity for the holder of the power over the land to need to rebuild and revitalize the utilization of the land and it is regulated in it by other parties who can carry out reconstruction and revitalization based on the provision of spiritual funds to the power over land or the power of utilization. With the changes mentioned above, it is seen that it will be a step closer to the realization of justice, welfare, and prosperity in providing compensation for the destroyed land.</p>