Excessive N loading from subsurface tile drainage has been linked to water quality degradation. Controlled tile drainage (CTD) has the potential to reduce N losses via tile drainage and boost crop yields. While CTD can reduce N loss from tile drainage, it may increase losses through other pathways. A multiple-year field-scale accounting of major N inputs and outputs during the cropping season was conducted on freely drained and controlled tile drained agricultural fields under corn ( L.)-soybean [ (L.) Merr.] production systems in eastern Ontario, Canada. Greater predicted gaseous N emissions for corn and soybean and greater observed lateral seepage N losses were observed for corn and soybean fields under CTD relative to free-draining fields. However, observed N losses from tile were significantly lower for CTD fields, in relation to freely drained fields. Changes in residual soil N were essentially equivalent between drainage treatments, while mass balance residual terms were systematically negative (slightly more so for CTD). Increases in plant N uptake associated with CTD were observed, probably resulting in higher grain yields for corn and soybean. This study illustrates the benefits of CTD in decreasing subsurface tile drainage N losses and boosting crop yields, while demonstrating the potential for CTD to increase N losses via other pathways related to gaseous emissions and groundwater seepage.
Controlled tile drainage (CTD) regulates water and nutrient export from tile drainage systems. Observations of the effects of CTD imposed en masse at watershed scales are needed to determine the effect on downstream receptors. A paired-watershed approach was used to evaluate the effect of field-to-field CTD at the watershed scale on fluxes and flow-weighted mean concentrations (FWMCs) of N and P during multiple growing seasons. One watershed (467-ha catchment area) was under CTD management (treatment [CTD] watershed); the other (250-ha catchment area) had freely draining or uncontrolled tile drainage (UCTD) (reference [UCTD] watershed). The paired agricultural watersheds are located in eastern Ontario, Canada. Analysis of covariance and paired t tests were used to assess daily fluxes and FWMCs during a calibration period when CTD intervention on the treatment watershed was minimal (2005)(2006), when only 4-10% of the tile-drained area was under CTD) and a treatment period when the treatment (CTD) watershed had prolific CTD intervention (2007-2011 when 82% of tile drained fields were controlled, occupying >70% of catchment area). Significant linear regression slope changes assessed using ANCOVA (p ≤ 0.1) for daily fluxes from upstream and downstream monitoring sites pooled by calibration and treatment period were -0.06 and -0.20 (stream water) (negative values represent flux declines in CTD watershed), -0.59 and -0.77 (NH 4 + -N), -0.14 and -0.15 (NO 3 --N), -1.77 and -2.10 (dissolved reactive P), and -0.28 and 0.45 (total P). Total P results for one site comparison contrasted with other findings likely due to unknown in-stream processes affecting total P loading, not efficacy of CTD. The FWMC results were mixed and inconclusive but suggest physical abatement by CTD is the means by which nutrient fluxes are predominantly reduced at these scales. Overall, our study results indicate that CTD is an effective practice for reducing watershed scale fluxes of stream water, N, and P during the growing season. Bridgeman et al., 2013), and other surface waters throughout North America (Magnien et al., 1995;Skaggs et al., 1994;Schindler et al., 2012). In fact, one of the world's largest hypoxia dead zones exists in the Gulf of Mexico largely as a result of excessive nutrient inputs from agricultural activity in the Mississippi River basin (Rabalais et al., 2002).Artificial subsurface (tile) drainage is used to improve field drainage for crop production. Tile drainage is critical in many crop production landscapes, and its importance is reflected by its ubiquity. For instance, in Ontario, Canada, we estimated that over 1.6 million ha of agricultural land is artificially (tile) drained. In the midwestern United States, it is estimated that 17.4 million ha of land is artificially drained ( Jaynes and Isenhart, 2014). Tile drains can be efficient pathways by which contaminants from fields can enter the broader surface water environment (Gilliam et al., 1979;Kladivko et al., 1991;Drury et al., 1996;Gentry et al., 1998...
Background: Aliarcobacter faecis and Aliarcobacter lanthieri are recently identified as emerging human and animal pathogens. In this paper, we demonstrate the development and optimization of two direct DNA-based quantitative real-time PCR assays using species-specific oligonucleotide primer pairs derived from rpoB and gyrA genes for A. faecis and A. lanthieri, respectively. Initially, the specificity of primers and amplicon size of each target reference strain was verified and confirmed by melt curve analysis. Standard curves were developed with a minimum quantification limit of 100 cells mL − 1 or g − 1 obtained using known quantities of spiked A. faecis and A. lanthieri reference strains in autoclaved agricultural surface water and dairy cow manure samples. Results: Each species-specific qPCR assay was validated and applied to determine the rate of prevalence and quantify the total number of cells of each target species in natural surface waters of an agriculturally-dominant and non-agricultural reference watershed. In addition, the prevalence and densities were determined for human and various animal (e.g., dogs, cats, dairy cow, and poultry) fecal samples. Overall, the prevalence of A. faecis for surface water and feces was 21 and 28%, respectively. The maximum A. faecis concentration for water and feces was 2.3 × 10 7 cells 100 mL-1 and 1.2 × 10 7 cells g − 1 , respectively. A. lanthieri was detected at a lower frequency (2%) with a maximum concentration in surface water of 4.2 × 10 5 cells 100 mL − 1 ; fecal samples had a prevalence and maximum density of 10% and 2.0 × 10 6 cells g − 1 , respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.