In their decision about dietary supplement use, both groups were guided by their own convictions to a great extent. Both groups would benefit from improved understanding of the health effects of dietary supplements to improve informed decision making.
Background Information provided in an interactive way is believed to be engaging because users can actively explore the information. Yet empirical findings often contradict this assumption. Consequently, there is still little known about whether and how interactivity affects communication outcomes such as recall. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate mechanisms through which interactivity affects recall of online health information. We tested whether and how cognitive involvement, perceived active control, and cognitive load mediate the effects of interactivity on recall. In addition, we examined need for cognition and health literacy as potential moderators of the mediation effects. Given the increasing popularity of dietary supplement use, our health website focused on this topic. Methods In an online between-subjects experiment (n=983), participants were randomly assigned to control condition (no interactive features), moderate interactivity (dropdown menus), and high interactivity (dropdown menus and responsive infographics). Two weeks before the experiment, background characteristics and moderating variables were measured. During website visit, data on users’ online behavior were collected. Recall was measured postexposure. Results Participants recalled significantly less information in the moderate (mean 3.48 [SD 2.71]) and high (mean 3.52 [SD 2.64]) interactivity conditions compared with the control condition (mean 5.63 [SD 2.18]). In the mediation analysis, we found direct, negative effects of moderate (b=–2.25, 95% CI –2.59 to –1.90) and high (b=–2.16, 95% CI –2.51 to –1.81) levels of interactivity on recall as well. In the relationship between interactivity and recall, cognitive involvement had a partial negative mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=–.20; 95% CI –0.31 to –0.10; high interactivity: b=–.21, 95% CI –0.33 to –0.10) and perceived active control had a partial positive mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.40; high interactivity: b=.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.40). Conclusions Interactivity decreased recall. In addition, through interactivity participants were less involved with the content of the information, yet they felt they had more control over the information. These effects were stronger in the high need for cognition and high health literate groups compared with their counterparts.
People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
BACKGROUND Information that is provided in an interactive way is believed to be engaging because users are provided with the possibility to actively explore the information. Yet empirical findings often contradict this assumption. Consequently, there is still little known about whether and how interactivity affects communication outcomes, such as recall. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate mechanisms through which interactivity may affect recall of online health information. We tested whether and how cognitive involvement, perceived active control, and cognitive load mediates the effects of interactivity on recall. In addition, we examined need for cognition and health literacy as potential moderators of the mediation-effects. METHODS In an online between-subjects experiment (n=983), we manipulated the levels of interactivity by increasing the number of interactive features on a website: control condition (no interactive features), moderate interactivity (dropdown menu), and high interactivity (dropdown menu and responsive infographics). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. Two weeks before the experiment, background characteristics and moderating variables were measured. In the actual experiment, pre- (control variables) and post exposure (outcomes) measures were applied. In addition, during website visit data on users’ online behavior was collected. RESULTS Moderate and high levels of interactivity decreased recall through lowered levels of cognitive involvement (Moderate interactivity: b=−.20; 95%CI −.31 to −.10; High interactivity: b=−.21, 95%CI −.33 to −.10), but increased recall through enhanced perceptions of active control (Moderate interactivity: b=.28, 95%CI .18 to .40, High interactivity: b=.27, 95%CI .16 to .40). The mediations found were partial since moderate (b=−2.25, 95%CI −2.59 to −1.90) and high interactivity (b=−2.16, 95%CI −2.51 to −1.81) had direct effects on recall as well. The mediation-effects of cognitive involvement and perceived active control were more prevalent in the high need for cognition and high health literate groups, as compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS From a cognitive resources perspective, results indicate that individuals tend to devote more resources to controlling the interactive website than to get involved with the content, especially those who are more motivated and skilled to process information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.