The promise of tumor-selective delivery of cytotoxic agents in the form of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) has now been realized, evidenced by the approval of two ADCs, both of which incorporate highly cytotoxic tubulin-interacting agents, for cancer therapy. An ongoing challenge remains in identifying potent agents with alternative mechanisms of cell killing that can provide ADCs with high therapeutic indices and favorable tolerability. Here, we describe the development of a new class of potent DNA alkylating agents that meets these objectives. Through chemical design, we changed the mechanism of action of our novel DNA cross-linking agent to a monofunctional DNA alkylator. This modification, coupled with linker optimization, generated ADCs that were well tolerated in mice and demonstrated robust antitumor activity in multiple tumor models at doses 1.5% to 3.5% of maximally tolerated levels. These properties underscore the considerable potential of these purpose-created, unique DNAinteracting conjugates for broadening the clinical application of ADC technology. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(8); 1870-8. Ó2016 AACR.

Tumor-selective delivery of cytotoxic agents in the form of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is now a clinically validated approach for cancer treatment. In an attempt to improve the clinical success rate of ADCs, emphasis has been recently placed on the use of DNA-cross-linking pyrrolobenzodiazepine compounds as the payload. Despite promising early clinical results with this class of ADCs, doses achievable have been low due to systemic toxicity. Here we describe the development of a new class of potent DNA-interacting agents wherein changing the mechanism of action from a cross-linker to a DNA alkylator improves the tolerability of the ADC. ADCs containing the DNA alkylator displayed similar in vitro potency, but improved bystander killing and in vivo efficacy, compared to those of the cross-linker. Thus, the improved in vivo tolerability and anti-tumor activity achieved in rodent models with ADCs of the novel DNA alkylator could provide an efficacious, yet safer option for cancer treatment.on May 9, 2018.

The synthesis and biological evaluation of phosphate prodrugs of analogues of 1 (CC-1065) and their conjugates with antibodies are described. The phosphate group on the 1,2,9,9a-tetrahydrocyclopropa[c]benz[e]indol-4-one (CBI) portion of the compounds confers enhanced solubility and stability in aqueous solutions. In the presence of phosphatases, these compounds convert into active DNA-alkylating agents. The synthesis of the prodrugs was achieved sequentially through coupling of CBI with a bis-indolyl moiety, followed by attachment of a thiol-containing linker, and conversion of the hydroxyl group of CBI into a phosphate prodrug. The linkers incorporated into the prodrugs enable conjugation to an antibody via either a stable disulfide or thioether bond, in aqueous buffer solutions containing as little as 5% organic cosolvent, resulting in exclusively monomeric and stable antibody-cytotoxic prodrug conjugates. Two disulfide-containing linkers differing in the degree of steric hindrance were used in antibody conjugates to test the effect of different rates of intracellular disulfide cleavage and effector release on biological activity. The prodrugs can be converted to the active cytotoxic compounds through the action of endogenous phosphatases. Antibody-prodrug conjugates displayed potent antigen-selective cytotoxic activity in vitro and antitumor activity in vivo.

Although peptide linkers are used in multiple clinical-stage ADCs, there are only few reports on optimizing peptide linkers for efficient lysosomal proteolysis and for stability in circulation. We screened multiple dipeptide linkers for efficiency of proteolysis and compared them to the dipeptide linkers currently being evaluated in the clinic: Val-Cit, Val-Ala, and Ala-Ala. Lead dipeptide linkers selected from the initial screen were incorporated into ADCs with indolinobenzodiazepine dimer (IGN) payloads to evaluate cellular processing, in vitro cytotoxic activity, plasma stability, and in vivo efficacy. ADCs with several dipeptide linkers bearing l-amino acids showed faster lysosomal processing in target cancer cells compared to the l-Ala-l-Ala linked ADC. These variances in linker processing rates did not result in different in vitro and in vivo activities among peptide linker ADCs, presumably due to accumulation of threshold cytotoxic catabolite levels for ADCs of several peptide linkers in the cell lines and xenografts tested. ADCs with l-amino acid dipeptide linkers exhibited superior in vitro cytotoxic potencies in multiple cell lines compared to an ADC with a d-Ala-d-Ala dipeptide linker and an ADC with a noncleavable linker. This work adds to the toolbox of stable, lysosomally cleavable peptide linkers for ADCs.

Antibody−drug conjugates have elicited great interest recently as targeted chemotherapies for cancer. Recent preclinical and clinical data have continued to raise questions about optimizing the design of these complex therapeutics. Biochemical methods for site-specific antibody conjugation have been a design feature of recent clinical ADCs, and preclinical reports suggest that site-specifically conjugated ADCs generically offer improved therapeutic indices (i.e., the fold difference between efficacious and maximum tolerated doses). Here we present the results of a systematic preclinical comparison of ADCs embodying the DNA-alkylating linker-payload DGN549 generated with both heterogeneous lysine-directed and site-specific cysteine-directed conjugation chemistries. Importantly, the catabolites generated by each ADC are the same regardless of the conjugation format. In two different model systems evaluated, the site-specific ADC showed a therapeutic index benefit. However, the therapeutic index benefit is different in each case: both show evidence of improved tolerability, though with different magnitudes, and in one case significant efficacy improvement is also observed. These results support our contention that conjugation chemistry of ADCs is best evaluated in the context of a particular antibody, target, and linker-payload, and ideally across multiple disease models.