No abstract

Background Panel management is emphasized as a subcompetency in internal medicine graduate medical education. Despite its importance, there are few published curricula on population medicine in internal medicine residency programs.Objective We explored resident experiences and clinical outcomes of a 5-month diabetes and obesity ambulatory panel management curriculum.Methods From August through December 2016, internal medicine residents at the University of Vermont Medical Center reviewed registries of their patients with diabetes, prediabetes, and obesity; completed learning modules; coordinated patient outreach; and updated gaps in care. Resident worksheets, surveys, and reflections were analyzed using descriptive and thematic analyses. Before and after mean hemoglobin A1c results were obtained for patients in the diabetic group.Results Most residents completed the worksheet, survey, and reflection (93%-98%, N¼42). The worksheets showed 70% of participants in the diabetic group had appointments scheduled after outreach, 42% were offered referrals to the Community Health Team, and 69% had overdue laboratory tests ordered. Residents reported they worked well with staff (95%), were successful in coordinating outreach (67%), and increased their sense of patient care ownership (66%). In reflections, identified successes were improved patient care, teamwork, and relationship with patients, while barriers included difficulty ensuring follow-up, competing patient priorities, and difficulty with patient engagement. Precurricular mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.7%, and postcurricular was 7.6% (P ¼ .41). ConclusionsThe curriculum offered a feasible, longitudinal model to introduce residents to population health skills and interdisciplinary care coordination. Although mean hemoglobin A1c did not change, residents reported improved patient care. Identified barriers present opportunities for resident education in patient engagement.

Many older adults face significant transportation challenges that negatively affect their health and well-being.

BACKGROUND: Panel management (PM) curricula in internal medicine (IM) residency programs often assign performance measures which may not address the varied interests or needs of resident-learners. AIM: To evaluate a self-directed learning (SDL)-based PM curriculum. SETTING: University-based primary care practice in Burlington, Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five internal medicine residents participated. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Residents completed a PM curriculum that integrated SDL, electronic health record (EHR)-driven performance feedback, mentorship, and autonomy to set learning and patient care goals. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Pre/post-curricular surveys assessed EHR tool acceptability, weekly curricular surveys and post-curricular focus groups assessed resident perceptions and goals, and an interrupted time series analysis of care gap closure rates was used to compare the pre-intervention and intervention periods. Majority of residents (28-32 or 80-91%) completed the surveys and focus groups. Residents found the EHR tools acceptable and valued protected time, mentorship, and autonomy to set goals. A total of 13,313 patient visits were analyzed. There were no significant differences between rates between the pre-intervention period and the first intervention period (p=0.44). DISCUSSION: A longitudinal PM curriculum that incorporated SDL and goal setting with EHR-driven performance feedback was well-received by residents, however did not significantly impact the rate of care gap closure.