Summary
The proteasome inhibitors Carfilzomib (Cfz) and Bortezomib (Btz) are used successfully to treat MM, but have not shown clinical efficacy in solid tumors. Here we show that clinically achievable inhibition of the β5 site of the proteasome by Cfz and Btz does not result in loss of viability of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. We use site-specific inhibitors and CRISPR-mediated genetic inactivation of β1 and β2 to demonstrate that inhibiting a second site of the proteasome, particularly the β2 site, sensitizes cell lines to Btz and Cfz in vitro and in vivo. Inhibiting both β5 and β2 suppresses production of the soluble, active form of the transcription factor Nrf1 and prevents the recovery of proteasome activity through induction of new proteasomes. These findings provide a strong rationale for the development of dual β5 and β2 inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors.
ABSTRACTby IRE-1a knockdown is characterized by decreased activation of the UPR and a less mature phenotype with a lack of fully developed ER. Likewise, myeloma cells adapted to bortezomib treatment in vitro (bortezomib-adapted cells) have a reduced rate of protein biosynthesis and a low activation state of the UPR. 20 Together, these data support a "low-IRE-1-a/XBP-1-model" of bortezomib resistance, the validity of which is supported by the identification of XBP1-negative, immature myeloma cell populations accumulating in bortezomib-resistant patients.19
Subunit-selective
proteasome inhibitors are valuable tools to assess
the biological and medicinal relevance of individual proteasome active
sites. Whereas the inhibitors for the β1c, β1i, β5c,
and β5i subunits exploit the differences in the substrate-binding
channels identified by X-ray crystallography, compounds selectively
targeting β2c or β2i could not yet be rationally designed
because of the high structural similarity of these two subunits. Here,
we report the development, chemical synthesis, and biological screening
of a compound library that led to the identification of the β2c-
and β2i-selective compounds LU-002c (4; IC50 β2c: 8 nM, IC50 β2i/β2c: 40-fold)
and LU-002i (5; IC50 β2i: 220 nM, IC50 β2c/β2i: 45-fold), respectively. Co-crystal
structures with β2 humanized yeast proteasomes visualize protein–ligand
interactions crucial for subunit specificity. Altogether, organic
syntheses, activity-based protein profiling, yeast mutagenesis, and
structural biology allowed us to decipher significant differences
of β2 substrate-binding channels and to complete the set of
subunit-selective proteasome inhibitors.
Phlorins bearing different substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized meso-position were investigated. The extent to which different substituents at this unique position can influence phlorin spectroscopic properties, structure, and stability is of interest given that such substituents are not in direct conjugation with the phlorin macrocycle. While the effect of various substituents at the sp(2)-hybridized positions has been the subject of prior investigations, the impact of different substituents at the saturated carbon atom has not been systematically examined. In this study, phlorins with different combinations of geminal methyl and phenyl substituents were prepared in yields of 24-49% via dipyrromethane + dipyrromethanedicarbinol routes, and their NMR spectra, UV-vis spectra, X-ray crystal structures, and stability toward light and air were compared. The nature of the substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized position was found to impact spectroscopic properties, structure, and stability to varying degrees. Thus, the choice of substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized meso-position provides a further option for altering phlorin properties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.