This paper explores the potential of the partnership model to minimise and transform the marginalisation and disadvantage felt by rural communities due to the impacts of globalisation. It evaluates the effectiveness of the partnership model in this endeavour by examining one particular case study. Torrens Valley Youth Programme is a successful example of an innovative Community Partnership model in rural South Australia accomplished with minimal funding. This Case Study presents the evolution of a partnership between a rural community centre and a non government organisation into a sustainable and community-funded development programme responding to the needs of local young people. The programme's financial and social capital sustainability is attributed to Project Management based on community development principles, including honouring the community centre's invitation of partnership, facilitating regular forums to give young people a mechanism for collective action, and building relationships with the local media. This has culminated in the present transition of the community centre to independent management of the programme. These outcomes demonstrate the value of Community Partnerships as a powerful approach within the community development tool kit. Introduction: Setting the scene Information, communication and transportation technologies have advanced to the point where the global economy is now a daily reality. Capital is moved around the global market with decreasing regard for national boundaries and regulations. In 1998 more than $1.5 trillion flowed across international borders each day. This was a 30% increase from global capital exchanges in 1994 (Brecher and Costello 1998). The movement of capital, the increase in size and growth of multinational companies, and the trend towards a global monoculture has become known as 'globalisation'. At the same time, the nation-state appears to be experiencing a decrease in its autonomy, power and relevance within the global arena. Individual governments are losing their ability to prevent or regulate activities by companies within their own territory. Despite an overall increase in global wealth, the number of people living in poverty has increased, as has the gap between rich and poor (van der Gaag 1999:18). This trend is caused by a web of structural and personal causes, not the least of which is globalisation. Brecher and Costello (1998) argue that the globalisation of capital is resulting in workers, communities and countries being forced to lower wages, working conditions, environmental protection, and social expenditure in order to be competitive. The average person has felt the effects of this globalisation through rising unemployment in their community, falling real incomes, mass layoffs, cutbacks in public services, deteriorating employment conditions, reduction of small business, increased destruction of the environment, and loss of democratic control over their governments and societies. These issues have multiple causes, including historical forces....