The Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18–64 years and Adults aged 65 years and older (“Guidelines”) integrate recommendations for physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviours. Given the novelty of these integrated Guidelines, it was important to consider messaging strategies that would be most effective in reaching Canadian adults. The purpose of this study was to examine optimal messaging of the Guidelines as it pertains to communication channels and messages. Representative samples of Guideline end-users (N = 1017) and stakeholders (N = 877) each completed a cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics were calculated along with tests of statistical significance. Inductive content analysis was used to code stakeholders’ comments (i.e., suggestions, concerns) on a draft version of the Guidelines. Most end-users had recently referred to online medical resources; family, friends, and co-workers; and physicians as communication channels for information regarding the movement behaviours. End-users and stakeholders felt that generic messages would foster self-efficacy to meet the Guidelines. Stakeholders highlighted a variety of considerations to ensure the Guidelines are inclusive towards diverse groups within the Canadian population. Findings will inform Guideline messaging. Novelty Most end-users referred to online medical resources; family, friends, and co-workers; and physicians as communication channels. End-users and stakeholders indicated that generic messages would foster self-efficacy to meet the Guidelines. Stakeholders expressed concerns about the inclusivity of the Guidelines for diverse socioeconomic groups.

Establishing a step-by-step process that provides practitioners with a blueprint for translating movement guidelines into action stands to optimize the investment in guideline development, improve guideline promotion and uptake, and ultimately enhance population health. The purpose of this paper is to describe how the Knowledge-to-Action framework and integrated knowledge translation were operationalized to systematically inform our knowledge translation (KT) efforts for the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18–64 years and Adults aged 65 years or older. In October 2018, the need for a KT Process, operating in tandem with the Guideline Development Process, led to the establishment of a KT team with a specific structure and terms of reference. The KT team collaboratively agreed on decision-making principles prior to selecting target audiences to focus their efforts. We undertook formative research to assess the local context and determinants of guideline dissemination and implementation efforts among target audiences. Plans for the subsequent steps and research are outlined. We highlight recommendations and lessons learned for applying the process in other settings. Novelty We outline a collaborative and systematic process and research program for the knowledge translation of movement guidelines. This paper provides an innovative and replicable blueprint to optimize future movement guideline knowledge translation efforts.

One in five Canadians have a disability and there are well-documented gaps in care for this equity-deserving group that have roots in medical education. In this paper, we highlight the unintended consequences of ableist messaging for persons living with disabilities, particularly in the context of promoting healthy movement behaviours. With its broad reach and public trust, the medical community has a responsibility to acknowledge the reality of ableism and take meaningful action. We propose five strategies to counter ableist messaging in medical education: (1) increase knowledge and confidence among physicians and trainees to optimize movement behaviours in persons living with disabilities, (2) perform personal and institutional language audits to ensure terminology related to disability is inclusive and avoids causing unintended harm, (3) challenge ableist messages effectively, (4) address the unmet healthcare needs of persons living with disabilities, and (5) engage in efforts to reform medical curricula so that persons living with disabilities are represented and treated equitably. Physicians and trainees are well-positioned to deliver competent and inclusive care, making medical education an opportune setting to address health inequities related to disability.

Background Health care providers have reported low knowledge, skill, and confidence for discussing movement behaviours (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep), which may be improved with the use of tools to guide movement behaviour discussions in their practice. Past reviews have examined the psychometric properties, scoring, and behavioural outcomes of physical activity discussion tools. However, the features, perceptions, and effectiveness of discussion tools for physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep have not yet been synthesized. The aim of this review was to report and appraise tools for movement behaviour discussions between health care providers and adults 18 + years in a primary care context within Canada or analogous countries. Methods An integrated knowledge translation approach guided this review, whereby a working group of experts in medicine, knowledge translation, communications, kinesiology, and health promotion was engaged from research question formation to interpretation of findings. Three search approaches were used (i.e., peer-reviewed, grey literature, and forward searches) to identify studies reporting on perceptions and/or effectiveness of tools for physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results In total, 135 studies reporting on 61 tools (i.e., 51 on physical activity, one on sleep, and nine combining two movement behaviours) met inclusion criteria. Included tools served the purposes of assessment (n = 57), counselling (n = 50), prescription (n = 18), and/or referral (n = 12) of one or more movement behaviour. Most tools were used or intended for use by physicians, followed by nurses/nurse practitioners (n = 11), and adults accessing care (n = 10). Most tools were also used or intended to be used with adults without chronic conditions aged 18–64 years (n = 34), followed by adults with chronic conditions (n = 18). The quality of the 116 studies that evaluated tool effectiveness varied. Conclusions Many tools were positively perceived and were deemed effective at enhancing knowledge of, confidence for, ability in, and frequency of movement behaviour discussions. Future tools should guide discussions of all movement behaviours in an integrated manner in line with the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines. Practically, this review offers seven evidence-based recommendations that may guide future tool development and implementation.

INTRODUCTION: A source of error in electronic fetal monitoring occurs where there is confusion between the maternal heart rate (MHR) and the fetal heart rate (FHR). The fetal transducer can detect the MHR rather than the FHR. We studied the MHR during labor to determine the proportion of cases where the MHR was in the fetal range (>110 bpm) and could potentially cause confusion. METHODS: Consecutive cases of low risk patients in labor were studied. Cases required a minimum of 2 hours of archived continuous electronic monitoring of both the MHR (by oxygenation saturation probe) and FHR prior to full dilatation. For individual patients, MHR baseline was averaged over each hour in labor and the results express as the proportion of all MHRs >110 bpm during each hour before and after full dilatation. RESULTS: There were 80 labors included in the study with data available for a total range of 10 hours. In the first stage only 2.5% of labors had an MHR>110 bpm 7 hours prior to full dilation, rising to 15% at full dilatation. In the second stage this rose to 30% after 2 hours and 45% after 3 hours. CONCLUSION: An MHR in the fetal range is common in labor especially in the second stage. The potential for confusion is very significant and this can lead to poor outcomes if an abnormal FHR is misidentified as MHR in the apparently normal range.