Introduction Pneumonia of unknown cause was detected on 30 December 2019 in China. It was categorized as an outbreak and named as COVID-19 by the World Health Organization. The pandemic affects all people, but patient groups such as hemodialysis (HD) patients have been particularly affected. We do not know if refugees suffered more during the outbreak. In this study, we compared depressive symptom frequency between Syrian refugee HD patients and Turkish ones. Methods The study had a single-center, cross-sectional design. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively from patients’ files containing details about past medical history, demographic variables and laboratory values. Validated Turkish and Arabic forms of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used to assess depressive symptoms. BDI scores were compared according to nationality, demographic features and clinical data. A BDI score more than 14 was accepted as suspicion of depression. Results 119 patients were enrolled in the study. After the exclusion of 22 patients, 75 Turkish and 22 Syrian patients were included for further analysis. The median BDI (interquartile range) score for Turkish and Syrian patients were 12 (7–23) and 19.5 (12.7–25.2), respectively (p = 0.03). Suspicion of depression was present at 42.7% of Turkish, and 72.7% of Syrian HD patients (p = 0.013). Regarding all patients, phosphorus level, Kt/V, and nationality were significantly different between patients with and without suspicion of depression (p = 0.023, 0.039, 0.013, respectively). Conclusion Syrian patients had higher BDI scores and more depressive symptoms than Turkish patients. Additional national measures for better integration and more mental support to Syrian HD patients are needed.

No abstract

Abst ract RS3PE (remitting seronegative, symmetric synovitis with pitting edema) is a benign, seronegative syndrome, with an acute onset of pitting edema on the dorsum of both hands and feet, which affects predominantly peripheral joints such as wrists and ankles symmetrically. A 58-year-old man presented with acute symmetrical polysynovitis of the wrists and ankles associated with pitting edema on the dorsum of the both hands and feet. He responded well to low-dose corticosteroids. There was no evidence of erosion radiologically. The clinical manifestations of the patient were consistent with RS3PE syndrome. Here, we present a case of RS3PE and review the literature. (Turk J Rheumatol 2010; 25: 88-90

No abstract

Objectives: The present study aims to compare different types of insulin concerning treatment success and insulin dose requirement in type 2 diabetes patients who were receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy and to evaluate the causes of treatment failure despite high doses of insulin. Methods: In our retrospective study, 198 type 2 diabetes patients who were receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy included. Patients were divided into three groups according to the insulin types (Group 1: short and long-acting analogue insulin users (n=83), Group 2: short and long-acting human regular insulin users (n=58), Group 3: human regular insulin + long-acting analogue insulin users (57)). Demographic data and daily insulin doses were recorded from the patient follow-up files. These data and the rates of achievement of the target HbA1c levels were also compared between groups. In addition, insulin doses of the patients whose glycemic targets could and could not be achieved were compared. Results: In this study, 123 (62.1%) of the 198 patients were female and 65 (47.9 %) were male. The mean age of the three groups was 55.81±8.1, 58.3±8.9, 58.3±8.8, respectively. HbA1C values were 8.72±1.65% in group 1, 9.0±1.98% in group 2 and 9.05±2.24% in group 3. The rates of achievement HbA1c value below 7% were 27.7% in analogue insulin group, 25.9% human regular insulin group and 31.6% in regular + analogue insulin group (p >0.05). There were no significant differences in daily basal and bolus insulin doses, total daily and per kg insulin doses and basal-bolus rates between groups. Higher total daily insulin doses were determined in patients who could not achieve target glycemic values than achieved it in group 1 and 2. Higher basal insulin doses were determined in patients who could not achieve target glycemic values than could achieved it in group 3. Conclusion: In our study, in which we did not find any significant difference in the dose analysis between analogue and regular insulin, the findings showed that high insulin doses might not be sufficient for glycemic control. The underlying causes should be investigated and correctible reasons should be eliminated in these patients.