Malaria is a major public health problem particularly in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. In most urban areas, malaria transmission intensity is low thus monitoring trends using reliable tools is crucial to provide vital information for future management of the disease. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) such as Paracheck Pf® are now increasingly adopted for Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnosis and are advantageous and cost effective alternative to microscopy. This cross sectional survey was carried out during June 2005 to determine the prevalence of malaria in an urban setting and compare microscopy diagnosis versus Paracheck Pf® for detecting Plasmodium falciparum. Blood samples from a total of 301 children (<10 years) attending outpatient clinic at Makorora Health Centre, in Tanga, Tanzania were examined for the presence of malaria. Twenty-nine (9.6%) of the children were positive to malaria by microscopy while 30 (10.0%) were positive by Paracheck® test. Three out of 30 positive cases detected by Paracheck® were negative by microscopy; thus considered to be false positive results. For the 271 Paracheck Pf ® negative cases, 2 were positive by microscopy; yielding 2 false negative results. Paracheck Pf ® sensitivity and specificity were 93.1% and 98.9%, respectively. P. falciparum was the only malarial species observed among the 29 microscopy positive cases. The prevalence of anaemia among the children was 53.16%. These findings indicate a low prevalence of malaria in Tanga City and that Paracheck Pf ® can be an effective tool for malaria diagnosis

The aim of this study was to identify the efficacy of a staged diabetes management (SDM) clinic serving a low socio‐economic Hispanic population in achieving glycaemic goal. We analysed prospectively collected data from patients discharged from the clinic in 2008 with an admission HbA1c >8% (64mmol/mol) and >one clinic visit. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were determined for factors significantly associated with glycaemic goal achievement. Both those patients who achieved the clinic HbA1c goal of ≤8% (n=277) and those who did not (n=209) had a clinically significant decrease in HbA1c (‐3.13±1.80, ‐1.08±1.78). After adjustment, the following were associated with failure to achieve goal: higher admission HbA1c (%) 11.0±1.8 vs 10.3±1.7, AOR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.08, 1.37), p=0.0016; higher admission insulin (IU/kg/day) 0.56±0.58 vs 0.26±0.41, AOR 2.08 (1.09, 4.00), p=0.026; greater increase in insulin (IU/kg/day) 0.23±0.46 vs 0.09±0.32, AOR 2.38 (1.15, 5.00), p=0.02; and a longer stay (days) 229±110 vs 172±84, AOR 1.007 (1.003, 1.012), p=0.0008. In this SDM clinic, most patients achieved significant reduction in HbA1c. The study identified factors associated with a lower likelihood of achieving goal thereby demonstrating the value of review of the response to an SDM protocol in indicating areas for further improvement. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract