Background Although tourniquets are commonly used during TKA, that practice has long been surrounded by controversy. Quantifying the case for or against tourniquet use in TKA, in terms of patient-reported outcomes such as postoperative pain, is a priority. Questions/purposes The purpose of this study was to meta-analyze the available randomized trials on tourniquet use during TKA to determine whether use of a tourniquet during TKA (either for the entire procedure or some portion of it) is associated with (1) increased postoperative pain; (2) decreased ROM; and (3) longer lengths of hospital stay (LOS) compared with TKAs performed without a tourniquet. Methods We completed a systematic review and metaanalysis using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines to assess the impact of tourniquet use on patients after TKA. We searched the following databases from inception to February 1, 2015, for randomized controlled trials meeting prespecified inclusion criteria: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Postoperative pain was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were postoperative ROM and LOS. The initial search yielded 218 studies, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. For our primary analysis on pain and ROM, a total of eight studies (221 patients in the tourniquet group, 219 patients in the no-tourniquet group) were meta-analyzed. We also performed a subgroup meta-analysis on two studies that used the tourniquet only for a portion of the procedure (from osteotomy until the leg was wrapped with bandages) and defined this as half-course tourniquet use (n = 62 in this analysis). The Jadad scale was used to ascertain methodological quality, which ranged from 3 to 5 with a maximum possible score of 5. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with I 2 and chi-square tests. A fixed-effects (inverse variance) model was used when the effects were homogenous, which was only the case for postoperative pain; the other endpoints had moderate or high levels of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, and postoperative pain showed no evidence of publication bias, but the endpoint of LOS may have suffered from publication bias or poor methodological quality. We defined the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain as 20 mm on the 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Each author certifies that neither he or she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDAapproval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Objective This study aimed to determine the awareness, otological symptoms and prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Irish cold-water athletes. Method An online and in person cross-sectional survey was undertaken with Irish cold-water athletes to explore athletes' awareness, known prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses and attitudes towards preventive measures. Results Of the 926 participants surveyed, 67.5 per cent were aware of external auditory canal exostoses. Triathletes reported the lowest awareness (39.9 per cent) among water athletes. A total of 9.7 per cent (n = 90) had previously been diagnosed with external auditory canal exostoses and 46.7 per cent (n = 42) were non-surfers. Ear symptoms were reported in 76 per cent of athletes. Otoscopic examinations showed that 23.7 per cent had external auditory canal exostoses, 3.6 per cent of whom were aware of their diagnosis. Conclusion The majority of Irish surfing athletes are aware of external auditory canal exostoses. There is less awareness with regard to Ireland's newly emerging sports such as open water swimming and triathlons. Over 90 per cent of athletes surveyed had no idea they had external auditory canal exostoses, which highlights the need to increase public awareness.

Acute cholecystitis is a common inflammatory condition of the gallbladder caused most commonly byEscherichia coli,Enterococcus, andKlebsiellaorganisms. Streptococcus bovisis a Gram-positive, catalase-negative, anaerobic coccus found as a commensal inhabitant of the digestive system in 16% of healthy people. We report a rare case of acute cholecystitis caused byS bovisand discuss its implications with regard to the two knownS bovisbiotypes (I & II) both of which are associated with a number of other gastrointestinal diseases.