Background: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can be used to treat ischemic disease in cell-based therapy owing to their neovascularization potential. Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been widely used as strong anti-inflammatory reagents. However, despite their beneficial effects, side effects, such as impairing wound healing are commonly reported with GC-based therapy, and the effects of GC therapy on the wound healing function of EPCs are unclear.Methods: In this study, we investigated how GC treatment affects the characteristics and wound healing function of EPCs.Results: We found that GC treatment reduced the proliferative ability of EPCs. In addition, the expression of CXCR4 was dramatically impaired, which suppressed the migration of EPCs. A transplantation study in a flap mouse model revealed that GC-treated EPCs showed a poor homing ability to injured sites and a low activity for recruiting inflammatory cells, which led to wound healing dysfunction. Impairment of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthases, cyclooxygenase (COX2) and microsomal PGE2 synthase 1 (mPEGS1) were identified as being involved in the GC-induced impairment of the CXCR4 expression in EPCs. Treatment with PGE2 rescued the expression of CXCR4 and restored the migration ability of GC-treated EPCs. In addition, the PGE2 signal that activated the PI3K/AKT pathway was identified to be involved in the regulation of CXCR4 in EPCs under the effects of GCs. In addition, similar negative effects of GCs were observed in EPCs under hypoxic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, GCs independently impaired the PGE2 and HIF2α pathways, which downregulated the expression of CXCR4 in EPCs. Our findings highlighted the influences of GCs on the characteristics and functions of EPCs, suggesting that the use of EPCs for autologous cell transplantation in patients who have used GCs for a long time should be considered carefully.
Background:
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (
UGT1A1
) gene have been studied as an important factor in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (jaundice) severity. Specific ethnicities, including Asians, have certain SNPs that appear more frequently than others.
Aim:
To identify the most common SNPs in Indonesian neonates and their association with the severity of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
Methods:
Eighty-eight inborn and outborn jaundiced infants from three different hospitals (Bengkulu, Jakarta, Biak Papua) across Indonesia were enrolled in this cross-sectional study and their peak total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels assessed. SNP variant analyses of the TATAA box, promoter, and exon 1 regions of UGT1A1 gene from 78 of the 88 infants were carried out using the SNaPshot
R
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) System followed by DNA sequencing.
Results:
We detected SNP variants
UGT1A1
*
28, UGT1A1
*
60, UGT1A1
*
93
, and
UGT1A1
*
6
in our population. Mean total serum bilirubin (TSB) was 14.59 ± 5.57 mg/dL. Bivariate analyses using delivery location, gestational age, birth weight, mother's age, and ethnicity were shown to be associated with moderate-to-severe hyperbilirubinemia (
p
< 0.05). None of the four SNPs appeared to be associated with moderate-to-severe hyperbilirubinemia. In multivariate analysis, however, only the “other ethnic group” (e.g., Chinese, Bengkulu, Papua, Bima) category showed an association with moderate-to-severe hyperbilirubinemia, with an odds ratio of 6.49 (95% CI 1.01–41.67;
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions:
We found that the
UGT1A1
*
60
is the most common SNP detected in neonates with hyperbilirubinemia in the Indonesian population. Interestingly, in Indonesia,
UGT1A1
polymorphisms do not appear to be associated with differences in the severity of hyperbilirubinemia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.