Doxorubicin (DOX) is an effective chemotherapeutic treatment with lasting side effects in heart and skeletal muscle. DOX is known to bind with iron, contributing to oxidative damage resulting in cardiac and skeletal muscle toxicity. However, major cellular changes to iron regulation in response to DOX are poorly understood in liver, heart, and skeletal muscle. Additionally, two cotreatments, exercise (EX) and metformin (MET), were studied for their effectiveness in reducing DOX toxicity by ameliorating iron dysregulation and preventing oxidative stress. The purposes of this study were to 1) characterize the DOX-induced changes of the major iron regulation pathway in liver, heart, and skeletal muscle and 2) to determine whether EX and MET exert their benefits by minimizing DOX-induced iron dysregulation. Mice were assigned to receive saline or DOX (15 mg/kg) treatments, paired with either EX (5 days) or MET (500 mg/kg), and were euthanized 3 days after DOX treatment. Results suggest that the cellular response to DOX is protective against oxidative stress by reducing iron availability. DOX increased iron storage capacity through elevated ferritin levels in liver, heart, and skeletal muscle. DOX reduced iron transport capacity through reduced transferrin receptor levels in heart and skeletal muscle. EX and MET cotreatments had protective effects in the liver through reduced transferrin receptor levels. At 3 days after DOX, oxidative stress was mild, as shown by normal glutathione and lipid peroxidation levels. Together these results suggest that the cellular response to reduce iron availability in response to DOX treatment is sufficient to match oxidative stress.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Though effective in treating various types of cancer, the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin (DOX) is associated with skeletal muscle wasting and fatigue. The purpose of this study was to assess muscle function in situ following DOX administration in mice. Furthermore, pre-treatments with exercise (EX) or metformin (MET) were used in an attempt to preserve muscle function following DOX. Mice were assigned to the following groups: control, DOX, DOX + EX, or DOX + MET, and were given a single injection of DOX (15 mg/kg) or saline 3 days prior to sacrifice. Preceding the DOX injection, DOX + EX mice performed 60 min/day of running for 5 days, while DOX + MET mice received 5 daily oral doses of 500 mg/kg MET. Gastrocnemius–plantaris–soleus complex function was assessed in situ via direct stimulation of the sciatic nerve. DOX treatment increased time to half-relaxation following contractions, indicating impaired recovery (p < 0.05). Interestingly, EX prevented any increase in half-relaxation time, while MET did not. An impaired relaxation rate was associated with a reduction in SERCA1 protein content (p = 0.07) and AMPK phosphorylation (p < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in force production or mitochondrial respiration. These results suggest that EX, but not MET may be an effective strategy for the prevention of muscle fatigue following DOX administration in mice.