Migraine without aura is the most common form of migraine, characterized by recurrent disabling headache and associated autonomic symptoms. To identify common genetic variants for this migraine type, we analyzed genome-wide association data of 2,326 clinic-based German and Dutch patients and 4,580 population-matched controls. We selected SNPs from 12 loci with two or more SNPs with P-values < 1 × 10 −5 for follow-up in 2,508 patients and 2,652 controls. Two loci, i.e. 1q22 (MEF2D) and 3p24 (near TGFBR2) replicated convincingly (P = 4.9 × 10 −4 , P = 1.0 × 10 −4 , respectively). Meta-analysis of the discovery and replication data yielded two additional genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10 −8 ) loci in PHACTR1 and ASTN2. In addition, SNPs in two previously reported migraine loci in or near TRPM8 and LRP1 significantly replicated. This study reveals the first susceptibility loci for migraine without aura, thereby expanding our knowledge of this debilitating neurological disorder. Main textMigraine is a disabling episodic neurovascular brain disorder affecting 12% of the general population [1][2][3][4] . Migraine attacks are typically characterized by severe throbbing unilateral headache and nausea, vomiting and photo-and phonophobia (migraine without aura; MO). In up to one third of patients attacks may be associated with neurological aura symptoms (migraine with aura; MA). Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified a migraine susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q22, close to MTDH, in the clinic-based International Headache Genetics Consortium (IHGC) MA study 5 and three other loci in or near PRDM16, LRP1, and TRPM8 in the population-based migraine Women's Genome Health Study (WGHS) 6 . For TRPM8 there was suggestive association (P < 1 × 10 −5 ) also in the clinic-based IHGC MA GWAS 5 . Here we report the first GWAS in MO, the most common form of migraine. We analyzed two large samples from headache centres in Germany and the Netherlands including 2,326 MO patients and 4,580 population-matched controls (Supplementary Note and Supplementary Fig. 1). A quantile-quantile plot of the joint analysis ( Supplementary Fig. 2) and an overall inflation factor ( 1000) of 1.03 were used as final quality control measures. The discovery dataset identified one genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10 −8 ) locus on chromosome 1q22 as well as eleven additional loci containing multiple SNPs with suggestive association (P < 1 × 10 −5 ) (Supplementary Table 1). Eighteen SNPs from these 12 loci were taken forward to the replication stage in four Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Eight SNPs in six loci showed P-values < 0.05 in the replication study, and five of these SNPs also showed P-values < 5 × 10 −8 in the meta-analysis combining the discovery and replication cohorts (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3). Four loci (1q22, 3p24, 6p24, 9q33) replicated, although replication was less convincing for loci on 6p24 and 9q33 with replication P-values of 0.012 and 0.018, respectively, although P-values were < 5 × ...

ContextThere is a paucity of effective, well-tolerated drugs available for migraine prophylaxis.Objective To determine whether treatment with the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan is effective as a migraine-prophylactic drug.Design and Setting Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study performed in a Norwegian neurological outpatient clinic from January 2001 to February 2002.Patients Sixty patients aged 18 to 65 years with 2 to 6 migraine attacks per month were recruited mainly from newspaper advertisements.Interventions A placebo run-in period of 4 weeks was followed by two 12-week treatment periods separated by 4 weeks of placebo washout. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive one 16-mg candesartan cilexetil tablet daily in the first treatment period followed by 1 placebo tablet daily in the second period. The remaining 30 received placebo followed by candesartan. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary end point was number of days with headache; secondary end points included hours with headache, days with migraine, hours with migraine, headache severity index, level of disability, doses of triptans, doses of analgesics, acceptability of treatment, days of sick leave, and quality-of-life variables on the Short Form 36 questionnaire. ResultsIn a period of 12 weeks, the mean number of days with headache was 18.5 with placebo vs 13.6 with candesartan (P=.001) in the intention-to-treat analysis (n=57). Some secondary end points also favored candesartan, including hours with headache (139 vs 95; PϽ.001), days with migraine (12.6 vs 9.0; PϽ.001), hours with migraine (92.2 vs 59.4; PϽ.001), headache severity index (293 vs 191; PϽ.001), level of disability (20.6 vs 14.1; PϽ.001) and days of sick leave (3.9 vs 1.4; P=.01), although there were no significant differences in health-related quality of life. The number of candesartan responders (reduction of Ն50% compared with placebo) was 18 (31.6%) of 57 for days with headache and 23 (40.4%) of 57 for days with migraine. Adverse events were similar in the 2 periods. ConclusionIn this study, the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan provided effective migraine prophylaxis, with a tolerability profile comparable with that of placebo.

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 3) performed in 2006–2008 is a replication of the cross-sectional survey from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of questionnaire-based headache diagnoses using a personal interview by a neurologist as a gold standard. For the questionnaire-based status as headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa statistic of 0.70 were found. Chronic headache, chronic tension-type headache (TTH), and medication overuse headache (MOH) were diagnosed with a specificity of ≥99%, and a kappa statistic of ≥0.73. Lower figures were found for the diagnoses of migraine and TTH. For individuals with headache ≥1 day per month, a sensitivity of 58% (migraine) and 96% (TTH), a specificity of 91 and 69%, and a kappa statistic of 0.54 and 0.44 were found, respectively. The specificity for migraine with aura was 95%. In conclusion, the HUNT 3-questionnaire is a valid tool for identifying headache sufferers, and diagnosing patients with chronic headache, including chronic TTH and MOH. The more moderate sensitivity for migraine and TTH makes the questionnaire-based diagnoses of migraine and TTH suboptimal for determining the prevalence. However, the high specificity of the questionnaire-based diagnosis of migraine, in particular for migraine with aura, makes the questionnaire a valid tool for diagnosing patients with migraine for genetic studies.

EUDRACT (2008-002312-7), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00884663).