The conserved, abundant chromosomal protein HMG1 consists of two highly homologous, folded, basic DNA‐binding domains, each of approximately 80 amino acid residues, and an acidic C‐terminal tail. Each folded domain represents an ‘HMG box’, a sequence motif recently recognized in certain sequence‐specific DNA‐binding proteins and which also occurs in abundant HMG1‐like proteins that bind to DNA without sequence specificity. The HMG box is defined by a set of highly conserved residues (most distinctively aromatic and basic) and appears to define a novel DNA‐binding structural motif. We have expressed the HMG box region of the B‐domain of rat HMG1 (residues 88–164 of the intact protein) in Escherichia coli and we describe here the determination of its structure by 2D 1H‐NMR spectroscopy. There are three alpha‐helices (residues 13–29, 34–48 and 50–74), which together account for approximately 75% of the total residues and contain many of the conserved basic and aromatic residues. Strikingly, the molecule is L‐shaped, the angle of approximately 80 degrees between the two arms being defined by a cluster of conserved, predominantly aromatic, residues. The distinctive shape of the HMG box motif, which is distinct from hitherto characterized DNA‐binding motifs, may be significant in relation to its recognition of four‐way DNA junctions.

The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family of proteins is involved in gene silencing via the formation of heterochromatic structures. They are composed of two related domains: an N-terminal chromo domain and a C-terminal shadow chromo domain. Present results suggest that chromo domains may function as protein interaction motifs, bringing together different proteins in multi-protein complexes and locating them in heterochromatin. We have previously determined the structure of the chromo domain from the mouse HP1β protein, MOD1. We show here that, in contrast to the chromo domain, the shadow chromo domain is a homodimer. The intact HP1β protein is also dimeric, where the interaction is mediated by the shadow chromo domain, with the chromo domains moving independently of each other at the end of flexible linkers. Mapping studies, with fragments of the CAF1 and TIF1β proteins, show that an intact, dimeric, shadow chromo domain structure is required for complex formation. Keywords: chromatin structure/chromo domain/ heterochromatin protein 1/protein complex/protein structure

A high-resolution solution structure of the GDP form of a truncated version of the ras p21 protein (residues 1-166) has been determined using NMR spectroscopy. Ras p21 is the product of the human ras protooncogene and a member of a ubiquitous eukaryotic gene family which is highly conserved in evolution. A virtually complete assignment (13C, 15N, and 1H), including stereospecific assignments of 54 C beta methylene protons and 10 C gamma methyl protons of valine residues, was obtained by analysis of three- and four-dimensional (3D and 4D) heteronuclear NMR spectra using a newly developed 3D/4D version of the ANSIG software. A total of 40 converged structures were computed from 3369 experimental restraints consisting of 3,167 nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) derived distances, 14 phi and 54 chi 1 torsion angle restraints, 109 hydrogen bond distance restraints, and an additional 25 restraints derived from literature data defining interactions between the GDP ligand, the magnesium ion, and the protein. The structure in the region of residues 58-66 (loop L4), and to a lesser degree residues 30-38 (loop L2), is ill-defined. Analysis of the dynamics of the backbone 15N nuclei in the protein showed that residues within the regions 58-66, 107-109, and, to a lesser degree, 30-38 are dynamically mobile on the nanosecond time scale. The root mean square (rms) deviations between the 40 solution structures and the mean atomic coordinates are 0.78 A for the backbone heavy atoms and 1.29 A for all non-hydrogen atoms if all residues (1-166) are included in the analysis. If residues 30-38 and residues 58-66 are excluded from the analysis, the rms deviations are reduced to 0.55 and 1.00 A, respectively. The structure was compared to the most highly refined X-ray crystal structure of ras p21.GDP (1-189) [Milburn, M. V., Tong, L., de Vos, A. M., Brünger, A. T., Yamaizumi, Z., Nishimura, S., & Kim, S.-H. (1990) Science 24, 939-945]. The structures are very similar except in the regions found to be mobile by NMR spectroscopy. In addition, the second alpha-helix (helix-2) has a slightly different orientation. The rms deviation between the average of the solution structures and the X-ray crystal structure is 0.94 A for the backbone heavy atoms if residues 31-37 and residues 59-73 are excluded from the analysis.

HMG1 has two homologous, folded DNA-binding domains ("HMG boxes"), A and B, linked by a short basic region to an acidic C-terminal domain. Like the whole protein, which may perform an architectural role in chromatin, the individual boxes bind to DNA without sequence specificity, have a preference for distorted or prebent DNA, and are able to bend DNA and constrain negative superhelical turns. They show qualitatively similar properties with quantitative differences. We have previously determined the structure of the HMG box from the central B-domain (77 residues) by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, which showed that it contains a novel fold [Weir et al. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1311-1319]. We have now determined the structure of the A-domain (as a Cys-->Ser mutant at position 22 to avoid oxidation, without effect on its DNA-binding properties or structure) using heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. The A-domain has a very similar global fold to the B-domain and the Drosophila protein HMG-D [Jones et al. (1994) Structure 2, 609-627]. There are small differences between A and B, in particular in the orientation of helix I, where the B-domain is more similar to HMG-D than it is to the A-domain; these differences may turn out to be related to the subtle differences in functional properties between the two domains [Teo et al. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 943-950] and will be the subject of further investigation. NMR studies of the interaction of the A-domain of HMG1 with a short double-stranded oligonucleotide support the notion that the protein binds via the concave face of the L-shaped structure; extensive contacts with the DNA are made by the N-terminal extended strand, the N-terminus of helix I, and the C-terminus of helix II. These contacts are very similar to those seen in the LEF-1 and SRY-DNA complexes [Love et al. (1995) Nature 376, 791-795; Werner et al. (1995) Cell 81, 705-714].

No abstract