No abstract

Robotic surgery for intracardiac pathologies in children is relatively uncommon. This study presents our initial experience with robotic-assisted cardiac surgery in children. We also present the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery in children. From May 2013 to June 2018, 30 children underwent totally endoscopic robotic atrial septal defect closure (n = 22), right-sided (n = 5) or left-sided (n = 1) partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair, tricuspid valve annuloplasty (n = 4), and mitral valve replacement (n = 2, due to Barlow and rheumatic diseases). The mean age of the patients was 16.1 ± 1.1 years (range, 13-17) and the mean weight was 56.7 ± 0.1 kg (range, 42-77). Associated anomalies included left persistent superior vena cava (n = 2) and the absence of innominate vein (n = 1). All procedures were completed uneventfully. Operation time was 4.1 ± 0.6 h. No patient was converted to thoracotomy or sternotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping times were 90.6 ± 28.0 (range, 45-136) and 48.6 ± 24.9 (range, 15-94) min, respectively. The mean ventilation time was 3.7 ± 1.2 h and hospital stay time was 3.3 ± 0.7 days. No right phrenic nerve injury, hemorrhage, or blood transfusion were noted. One patient had postoperative pneumothorax, and 1 had supraventricular arrhythmia. Follow-up was a mean of 1.7 years (range, 1-52 months). Patients were healthy and no residual intracardiac defect was observed on echocardiography examinations. There was no operative or follow-up mortality. Robotically assisted cardiac surgery is a feasible and safe approach in selected pediatric patients. In the future, new generation robotic devices may offer an alternative surgical approach in cardiac surgery for younger children with lower body weight.

No abstract

Background: Transcatheter closure is the preferred method for atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. Robotic surgery has become the least invasive technique for ASD closure. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent ASD closure with transcatheter or robotic surgery techniques.Methods: A total of 462 patients underwent totally endoscopic robotic (n = 217) or transcatheter ASD closure (n = 245). Demographic data, perioperative data, and outcomes were compared.Results: The mean age was lower in the robotic surgery group than the transcatheter group (31.4 ± 11.8 vs 39.4 ± 13.2 years; P = .001). Ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay was significantly lower in the transcatheter group. The postoperative new-onset neurological event was seen in one (0.5%) patient in robotic surgery, and four (1.6%) patients in the transcatheter closure group.New-onset atrial fibrillation was found to be higher in transcatheter closure (two vs seven patients; P = .133) group. Surgical conversion to a larger incision occurred in two patients (1%) in robotic surgery, while two patients (0.5%) underwent emergency median sternotomy due to device embolization to the main pulmonary artery.There was no mortality in both groups. During follow-up, one patient (0.5%) who underwent robotic surgery was reoperated, and two patients (0.8%) who underwent transcatheter procedure required surgical intervention due to device migration and severe residual shunting (P = .635).Conclusion: Both transcatheter and robotic surgery approaches had excellent outcomes but transcatheter closure had shorter hospital and ICU stays. Robotic surgery provides a similar complication risk that can be comparable to the transcatheter approach as well as patient comfort and cosmetic advantage over the other surgical techniques. K E Y W O R D Satrial septal defect, minimally invasive, robotic surgery, transcatheter