Despite being one of the metropolitan cities in Indonesia, the prevalence of stunting in Bandung City is more than the World Health Organization (WHO) standard. Stunting is a threat to the quality of human development, also lowering economic productivity. A strategy to reduce and handle stunting is needed so that social and environmental aspects are essential to facilitate the policymaker. This study analyzes the stunting situation in Bandung City and then arranges villages based on the stunting risk index to get an operative recommendation. The quantitative method analysis uses climate change adaptation which includes hazard and vulnerability indicators. At the same time, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) forms the qualitative method with key persons to identify problems and formulate impressive strategies. The results showed that 14 villages have the highest risk of stunting in Bandung City, to be intervention priority. These villages have relatively high poverty, poor access to sanitation, and low adaptive capacity. Recommendations from this study are focused on regional development planning, increasing community participation, and multi-stakeholder cooperation through strengthening innovation, collaboration, and innovation.

The phenomenon of climate change and global warming is driving the issue of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) developing in countries in the world, including Indonesia. Indonesia is incorporated in the Paris Agreement and follows up with the drafting of laws and regulations which form the basis for implementing SDG in the regions. Profile of achievement of Serang City Sustainable Development Goals based on the KLJDD KLHS Document shows that there are still 92 indicators (50, 27%) that have not been achieved. Previous research on strategies and road maps to achieve SDG at the regional level is still limited and is the state of the art of this research. The method used is a sequential transformative strategy mix method that is integrated with the TAIDA method as a scenario planning method, by prioritizing qualitative research through literature studies, personal observations, discussions, interviews which are part of the initial process of the TAIDA (tracking, analyzing) method. Followed by quantitative research through descriptive statistics on weight and rating calculations to formulate strategies and road maps (the next process of the TAIDA method: identifying, deciding, acting). The results of this study are that the strategy to achieve SDG is focused on 4 (four) aspects, namely aspects of regulation (synchronization of regulations), funding (potential funding other than APBD along with preparation of regional financial mechanisms), socialization (aimed at the public and all stakeholders through sharing media) and collaboration (initiation of cooperation with all parties and other local governments). The road map consists of 9 (nine) stages, from socializing to promoting best practices.

Research on infrastructure service satisfaction index, the direction of infrastructure development at the village level, and utilization of villages funds is still very minimal. The direction for the utilization of villages funds, in general, has been regulated in legislation, but there is no reference yet regarding the type of infrastructure that needs to be built in the villages, even though the process of infrastructure development planning is included in the development accountability assessment. The focus of this research is to analyze the direction of urban infrastructure development using village funds through analysis of the infrastructure service satisfaction index, community proposals, and the results of development evaluations. The research method used is qualitative through content analysis and interviews with village officials and planning officials in Serang City. The results showed that the acquisition of the infrastructure service satisfaction index value for each sub-district became a reference in determining the development of urban infrastructure, paying attention to the proposals of community priorities submitted at the meeting of urban residents, increasing the capacity of the apparatus and improving the development planning application system.

No abstract

Sumedang Regency is one of the 100 national priority areas for handling stunting. The challenges are getting heavier with disasters caused by climate change such as floods and drought which have an impact on food shortages and public health problems. This study aims to find priority villages for handling stunting using a climate change adaptation approach, and to provide more detailed information on socio-economic and environmental conditions so that specific intervention are recommended in each priority area. The quantitative method used as an approach to analyze 277 villages in Sumedang District, it used the concept of climate change adaptation from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR-5 2014 which includes hazard and vulnerability analysis. The analysis showed that there were 7 villages with the highest risk of stunting in Sumedang District. In general, these villages have a relatively high population, the water is non-potable, no proper sewage treatment, no temporary garbagedump, far from health facilities, lack of health workers, and do not have a development program such assanitation infrastructure and community empowerment facilities for housing environmental management.   Kabupaten Sumedang merupakan satu dari 100 wilayah prioritas nasional dalam penanganan stunting. Tantangan semakin berat dengan banyaknya bencana yang disebabkan perubahan iklim, seperti banjir dan kekeringan sehingga berdampak pada kekurangan pangan dan masalah kesehatan masyarakat. Lokasi prioritas penanganan stunting perlu memperhatikan aspek kewilayahan terkait lingkungan agar memudahkan pengambil kebijakan melakukan intervensi yang diperlukan dalam aspek sosial ekonomi dan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan desa/kelurahan prioritas penanganan stunting menggunakan pendekatan risiko adaptasi perubahan iklim, dan memberikan informasi lebih detail mengenai kondisi sosial ekonomi dan lingkungan sehingga diperoleh rekomendasi intervensi spesifik di setiap wilayah prioritas. Metode kuantitatif digunakan sebagai pendekatan untuk menganalisis 270 desa dan 7 kelurahan di Kabupaten Sumedang. Penelitian ini menggunakan konsep adaptasi perubahan iklim dari Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR-5 tahun 2014 yang meliputi analisis bahaya dan kerentanan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan terdapat 7 desa yang memiliki risiko kejadian stunting paling tinggi di Kabupaten Sumedang. Pada umumnya di desa-desa tersebut terdapat jumlah penduduk miskin yang relatif tinggi, air tidak layak minum, belum memiliki saluran pembuangan limbah yang baik, belum ada tempat pembuangan sampah sementara, jarak ke fasilitas kesehatan relatif jauh, tenaga kesehatan kurang, serta belum memiliki program pembangunan sarana prasarana sanitasi dan pemberdayaan masyarakat untuk pengelolaan lingkungan perumahan.