In this article, we propose a novel system for feature selection, which is one of the key problems in contentbased image indexing and retrieval as well as various other research fields such as pattern classification and genomic data analysis. The proposed system aims at enhancing semantic image retrieval results, decreasing retrieval process complexity, and improving the overall system usability for end-users of multimedia search engines. Three feature selection criteria and a decision method construct the feature selection system. Two novel feature selection criteria based on innercluster and intercluster relations are proposed in the article. A majority voting-based method is adapted for efficient selection of features and feature combinations. The performance of the proposed criteria is assessed over a large image database and a number of features, and is compared against competing techniques from the literature. Experiments show that the proposed feature selection system improves semantic performance results in image retrieval systems.

No abstract

No abstract

Recent advancements in machine learning research, i.e., deep learning, introduced methods that excel conventional algorithms as well as humans in several complex tasks, ranging from detection of objects in images and speech recognition to playing difficult strategic games. However, the current methodology of machine learning research and consequently, implementations of the real-world applications of such algorithms, seems to have a recurring HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known) issue. In this work, we elaborate on the algorithmic, economic and social reasons and consequences of this phenomenon. We present examples from current common practices of conducting machine learning research (e.g., avoidance of reporting negative results) and failure of generalization ability of the proposed algorithms and datasets in actual real-life usage. Furthermore, a potential future trajectory of machine learning research and development from the perspective of accountable, unbiased, ethical and privacy-aware algorithmic decision making is discussed. We would like to emphasize that with this discussion we neither claim to provide an exhaustive argumentation nor blame any specific institution or individual on the raised issues. This is simply a discussion put forth by us, insiders of the machine learning field, reflecting on us.

No abstract