SDs are common in cirrhotics and STSQS could be an appropriate and practical method for diagnosis of SDS in these patients. We can use it in cirrhotic patients at outpatient clinics.

No data exists regarding the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene polymorphisms in Turkish alcoholic cirrhotics. We studied the polymorphisms of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 genes in alcoholic cirrhotics and compared the results with non-cirrhotic alcoholics and healthy volunteers. Overall, 237 subjects were included for the study: 156 alcoholic patients (78 cirrhotics, 78 non-cirrhotic alcoholics) and 81 healthy volunteers. Three different single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotyping methods were used. ADH1C genotyping was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. The identified ADH1C genotypes were named according to the presence or absence of the enzyme restriction sites. ADH1B (Arg47Hys) genotyping was performed using the allele specific primer extension method, and ALDH2 (Glu487Lys) genotyping was performed by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction using two allele-specific primer pairs. For ADH1B, the frequency of allele *1 in the cirrhotics, non-cirrhotic alcoholics and healthy volunteers was 97.4%, 94.9% and 99.4%, respectively. For ADH1C, the frequency of allele *1 in the cirrhotics, non-cirrhotic alcoholics and healthy volunteers was 47%, 36.3% and 45%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the groups for ADH1B and ADH1C (p>0.05). All alcoholic and non-alcoholic subjects (100%) had the allele *1 for ALDH2. The obtained results for ADH1B, ADH1C, and ALDH gene polymorphisms in the present study are similar to the results of Caucasian studies. ADH1B and ADH1C genetic variations are not related to the development of alcoholism or susceptibility to alcoholic cirrhosis. ALDH2 gene has no genetic variation in the Turkish population.

PurposeThe activity of epithelial lactase (LCT) is associated with a polymorphism 13910 bp upstream in the lactase encoding gene. Because the association between the LCT-13910 polymorphism and the risk for colorectal cancer is not clear, we investigated the role of the LCT-13910 polymorphism as a potential risk factor for colorectal cancer and colorectal polyps in the Turkish population.MethodsOne hundred sixty-six subjects (74 with polyps, 44 with colorectal cancer, 48 controls), who had undergone a total colonoscopy between January 2012 and November 2012 in our endoscopy unit were genotyped for the LCT-13910 polymorphism by using the polymerase chain reaction and minisequencing.ResultsThe CC genotype in the lactose gene 13910 locus, which is accepted as the genetic indicator of lactase deficiency, was determined as 83.7%. The CC genotype rate was determined as 89.1% in patients who had a history of lactose intolerance and 81.5% in those without a history of lactose intolerance (P = 0.236). No difference was detected between the patients who had colorectal polyp(s) and/or cancer and the controls with regard to the LCT-13910 polymorphism. No differences were determined between groups when they were compared with regard to the C or the T allele.ConclusionNo differences were detected between the patients who had colorectal polyp(s) and/or cancer and those with normal colonoscopy findings with regard to lactase gene polymorphisms. No differences were determined between the groups when they were compared with regard to the C or the T allele.

No abstract

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine if the expression of the TLR2 and/or TLR4 genes is involved in triggering the auto-inflammatory attacks in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Thirty patients with FMF and 20 healthy control subjects were recruited. Comparisons were made in TLR2 and TLR4 gene expression levels during FMF attack episodes and attack-free periods, as well as with baseline levels in healthy control subjects. There was no significant difference in TLR2 and TLR4 gene expression between the attacks and attack-free periods in the entire group of FMF patients. However, among female patients, expression level of TLR4 gene was significantly higher during the attack than in the attack-free period (TLR2 Log 2.04 ± 0.14 vs. 2.52 ± 0.10, respectively, P = 0.02). There was not a significant difference between FMF patients and healthy subjects. The patients who had higher levels of TLR2 expression during the acute attack experienced their first attacks at an earlier age (r = -0.571; P = 0.001). The frequency of attacks, acute-phase response, MEFV mutations, and colchicine response were not associated with TLR2 and TLR4 levels. We conclude that changes in the expression of TLR2 and TLR4 genes do not appear to be involved in triggering FMF attacks. A higher level of TLR2 expression during acute attack may be related to the early onset of the disease. Further studies using specific cell populations such as neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells may be useful to explore any changes in the sensitivity of toll-like receptors to their agonists, such as lipopolysaccharides, in the onset of attacks.