Although there is a great deal of knowledge regarding the phylo- and ontogenetic plasticity of the neocortex, the precise nature of environmental impact on the newborn human brain is still one of the most controversial issues of neuroscience. The leading model–system of experience-dependent brain development is binocular vision, also called stereopsis. Here, we show that extra postnatal visual experience in preterm human neonates leads to a change in the developmental timing of binocular vision. The onset age of binocular function, as measured by the visual evoked response to dynamic random dot correlograms (DRDC-VEP), appears to be at around the same time after birth in preterm (4.07 mo) and full-term (3.78 mo) infants. To assess the integrity of the visual pathway in the studied infants, we also measured the latency of the visual-evoked response to pattern reversal stimuli (PR-VEP). PR-VEP latency is not affected by premature birth, demonstrating that the maturation of the visual pathway follows a preprogrammed developmental course. Despite the immaturity of the visual pathway, clearly demonstrated by the PR-VEP latencies, our DRCD-VEP data show that the visual cortex is remarkably ready to accept environmental stimulation right after birth. This early plasticity makes full use of the available extra stimulation time in preterm human infants and results in an early onset of cortical binocularity. According to our data, the developmental processes preceding the onset of binocular function are not preprogrammed, and the mechanisms turning on stereopsis are extremely experience-dependent in humans.

Dynamic random dot correlograms (DRDCs) are binocular stimuli that evoke a percept and a visual evoked potential (VEP) only in case of a mature and functional binocular system. DRDC-VEP is a method extensively used to study cortical binocularity in human infants and nonverbal children. Although the DRDC-VEP was invented 3 decades ago, neither the fundamental parameters, including contrast, of the stimulation nor the cerebral processing mechanisms have been clarified. The objective of the present study was to investigate the variability and detectability of adults' VEPs to DRDC under different stimulus contrast conditions. DRDCs were presented on the red and green channels of a computer monitor and were viewed with red-green goggles. The steady state DRDC-VEPs were recorded in healthy adult volunteers, and response reliability was assessed by the T(circ)(2) statistic. DRDC-VEP amplitude was independent of contrast, while VEP phases showed a weak correlation with contrast. Contrast invariance of DRDC-VEP amplitude suggests a very high contrast gain and dominant magnocellular input to the binocular correlation processing system.

Purpose Stereo vision tests are widely used in the clinical practice for screening amblyopia and amblyogenic conditions. According to literature, none of these tests seems to be suitable to be used alone as a simple and reliable tool. There has been a growing interest in developing new types of stereo vision tests, with sufficient sensitivity to detect amblyopia. This new generation of assessment tools should be computer based, and their reliability must be statistically warranted. The present study reports the clinical evaluation of a screening system based on random dot stereograms using a tablet as display. Specifically, a dynamic random dot stereotest with binocularly detectable Snellen-E optotype (DRDSE) was used and compared with the Lang II stereotest. Methods A total of 141 children (aged 4-14, mean age 8.9) were examined in a field study at the Department of Ophthalmology, Pécs, Hungary. Inclusion criteria consisted of diagnoses of amblyopia, anisometropia, convergent strabismus, and hyperopia. Children with no ophthalmic pathologies were also enrolled as controls. All subjects went through a regular pediatric ophthalmological examination before proceeding to the DRDSE and Lang II tests. Results DRDSE and Lang II tests were compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity for different conditions. DRDSE had a 100% sensitivity both for amblyopia (n = 11) and convergent strabismus (n = 21), as well as a 75% sensitivity for hyperopia (n = 36). However, the performance of DRDSE was not statistically significant when screening for anisometropia. On the other hand, Lang II proved to have 81.8% sensitivity for amblyopia, 80.9% for strabismus, and only 52.8% for hyperopia. The specificity of DRDSE was 61.2% for amblyopia, 67.3% for strabismus, and 68.6% for hyperopia, respectively. Conversely, Lang II showed about 10% better specificity, 73.8% for amblyopia, 79.2% for strabismus, and 77.9% for hyperopia. Conclusions The DRDSE test has a better sensitivity for the detection of conditions such as amblyopia or convergent strabismus compared with Lang II, although with slightly lower specificity. If the specificity could be further improved by optimization of the stimulus parameters, while keeping the sensitivity high, DRDSE would be a promising stereo vision test for screening of amblyopia.

Although dynamic random-dot correlogram evoked visual potentials (DRDC-VEPs) are a three-decade-old method to detect the cortical binocularity in humans and animals, our knowledge of the influence of fundamental stimulus parameters and the underlying cerebral processing mechanisms has remained limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of luminance on DRDC-VEPs in adults. The variability and detectability of DRDC-VEPs were investigated under different stimulus luminance conditions with neutral density filters. Our results have demonstrated that DRDC-VEPs can be evoked in a wide luminance range, and the response amplitude was practically independent of luminance between 4.75 cd m(-2) and 0.015 cd m(-2), while DRDC-VEP latencies showed a strong linear correlation with log luminance. There is, however, a limit (0.06 cd m(-2)) below which DRDC-VEPs are not reliably recordable. Luminance reduction-induced delays in DRDC-VEP latencies cannot be explained simply by retinal mechanisms, since their regression slope does not follow the course of electroretinogram and cortical evoked potential latencies. Luminance independence of DRDC-VEP amplitude suggests that binocular correlation-processing cortical neurons receive input predominantly from the magnocellular visual pathway.

Although development of binocularity is an extremely experience-dependent process, our data suggest that DRDC-VEP phase and P1 latency mature independently from visual experience. We propose that both the phase shift and decreasing P1 latency are indicators of myelination and increasingly faster signal transmission in the developing visual system.