No abstract

Excessive bodyweight gain was reported during the 1950s as an adverse effect of typical antipsychotic drug treatment, but the magnitude of bodyweight gain was found to be higher with the atypical antipsychotic drugs that were introduced after 1990. Clozapine and olanzapine produce the greatest bodyweight gain, ziprasidone and aripiprazole have a neutral influence, and quetiapine and risperidone cause an intermediate effect. In the CATIE study, the percentage of patients with bodyweight gain of >7% compared with baseline differed significantly between the antipsychotic drugs, i.e. 30%, 16%, 14%, 12% and 7% for olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, perphenazine (a typical antipsychotic) and ziprasidone, respectively (p<0.001). Appetite stimulation is probably a key cause of bodyweight gain, but genetic polymorphisms modify the bodyweight response during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. In addition to nutritional advice, programmed physical activity, cognitive-behavioural training and atypical antipsychotic switching, pharmacological adjunctive treatments have been assessed to counteract excessive bodyweight gain. In some clinical trials, nizatidine, amantadine, reboxetine, topiramate, sibutramine and metformin proved effective in preventing or reversing atypical antipsychotic-induced bodyweight gain; however, the results are inconclusive since few randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials have been conducted. Indeed, most studies were short-term trials without adequate statistical power and, in the case of metformin, nizatidine and sibutramine, the results are contradictory. The tolerability profile of these agents is adequate. More studies are needed before formal recommendations on the use of these drugs can be made. Meanwhile, clinicians are advised to use any of these adjunctive treatments according to their individual pharmacological and tolerability profiles, and the patient's personal and family history of bodyweight gain and metabolic dysfunction.

This study provides information about the possibilities of performing laparoscopic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic vessels and laparoscopic transgastric drainage are feasible and safe techniques. They offer obvious advantages, such as reduction of the parietal damage to the abdomen, a shorter hospital stay, and an earlier postoperative recovery than can be obtained with conventional open pancreatic resection.

No abstract

Melkersson proposed leptin dysregulation as a factor in the olanzapine-induced metabolic dysfunction. Their suggestion was based on the absence of the expected positive correlation between serum leptin levels and the BMI, and the loss of the sex-dependent difference in leptin levels, which are higher in women. Although subsequent studies did not confirm that proposal, few of them assessed basal leptin levels and corrected for body fat percentage. Along with these variables, we added a precise definition of participants out of the expected positive correlation in a large sample of schizophrenia patients. Sixty patients (26 women and 34 men) with severe schizophrenia undergoing chronic hospitalization and conventional antipsychotic treatment were switched to olanzapine (10-20 mg/day). We assessed at baseline, and at weeks 8 and 16 of treatment, the percentage of participants with abnormal correlation (out of the 95% confidence interval in the regression line) between leptin levels and the BMI, and the correlation between leptin and insulin, glucose, the insulin resistance index, c-reactive protein (CRP) and treatment response. Leptin levels were higher in women than in men (P<0.01). The positive correlation between leptin levels, BMI and percentage of fat were preserved. After olanzapine, 3.8% of women and 2.9-5.8% of men were out the 95% confidence interval, and the proportion was similar at baseline. Glucose, insulin, the insulin resistance index and the CRP levels significantly increased after olanzapine. The impact of olanzapine on leptin regulation appears discrete and limited to a small number of participants. Additional studies must clarify the features that render them to metabolic dysregulation.