It is c'oncluded that the 4 sub-units cannot weight is identical with the molecular weight, all be the same, since the minimum molecular New York, N. Y.

No abstract

Perhaps a note which states how you calibrated your instruments to obtain the overall counting efficiency and calls explicit attention to the difference between counts per minute and disintegrations per minute would be appropriate. AnswerAll of our counting was done with a standard end-window type Geiger counter. With a counter of this type, the counting efficiency is dependent on the energy of the sample radiation and will vary from 0 to approximately 10 per cent for energies between approximately 0.1 Mev and 3.5 Mev. Emmons and I have done some work on this subject, and although the data are not ready for publication, we have established that the relation between counting efficiency and particle energy may be represented by a curve, the shape and position of which will vary depending on the characteristics of the counter and on the method of sample preparation. The average energy of the sample radiation can be closely approximated by absorption measurements. By using this method we were able to determine that the counting efficiency for the influent water should be 8.5 per cent, whereas that for the effluent, which was of different composition, F O LLOW I NG the appearance of an article on decontamination experiments in the May 1951 issue of the JOURNAL (1), Mr. Diskant asked Mr. Lauderdale .several questions related to the original articles. Those questions, together with Mr. Lauderdale's answers are presented below.