Background: The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor (IGF1R) is essential for normal development and growth. IGF1R mutations cause IGF-1 resistance resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth failure. The phenotypic spectrum related to IGF1R mutations remains to be fully understood. Methods: Auxological and endocrinological data of a patient identified previously were assessed. The patient's fibroblasts were studied to characterize the IGF1R deletion, mRNA fate, protein expression and signalling capabilities. Results: The boy, who carries a heterozygous IGF1R exon 6 deletion caused by Alu element-mediated recombination and a heterozygous SHOX variant (p.Met240Ile), was born appropriate for gestational age but developed proportionate short stature postnatally. IGF-1 levels were low-normal. None of the stigmata associated with SHOX deficiency or sporadically observed in IGF1R mutation carriers were present. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay led to a substantial decline of IGF1R dosage and IGF-1-dependent receptor autophosphorylation but not impaired downstream signalling. Conclusion: We present the first detailed report of an intragenic IGF1R deletion identified in a patient who, apart from short stature, deviates from all established markers that qualify a growth-retarded child for IGF1R analysis. Although such children will usually escape routine clinical mutation screenings, they can contribute to the understanding of factors and mechanisms that cooperate with the IGF1R.

Context IGF1 receptor mutations (IGF1RM) are rare; however, patients exhibit pronounced growth retardation without catch-up. Although several case reports exist, a comprehensive statistical analysis investigating growth profile and benefit of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment is still missing. Objective and methods Here, we compared IGF1RM carriers (n = 23) retrospectively regarding birth parameters, growth response to rhGH therapy, near final height, and glucose/insulin homeostasis to treated children born small for gestational age (SGA) (n = 34). Additionally, health profiles of adult IGF1RM carriers were surveyed by a questionnaire. Results IGF1RM carriers were significantly smaller at rhGH initiation and had a diminished first-year response compared to SGA children (Δ height standard deviation score: 0.29 vs. 0.65), resulting in a lower growth response under therapy. Interestingly, the number of poor therapy responders was three times higher for IGF1RM carriers than for SGA patients (53 % vs. 17 %). However, most IGF1RM good responders showed catch-up growth to the levels of SGA patients. Moreover, we observed no differences in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance before treatment, but during treatment insulin resistance was significantly increased in IGF1RM carriers compared to SGA children. Analyses in adult mutation carriers indicated no increased occurrence of comorbidities later in life compared to SGA controls. Conclusion In summary, IGF1RM carriers showed a more pronounced growth retardation and lower response to rhGH therapy compared to non-mutation carriers, with high individual variability. Therefore, a critical reevaluation of success should be performed periodically. In adulthood, we could not observe a significant influence of IGF1RM on metabolism and health of carriers.

No abstract