Aims: The dynamics of Escherichia coli near the maximum temperature for growth in a rich medium are analysed. The effects of temperature history, medium composition and physiological state of the inoculum are evaluated.
Methods and Results: Kinetics of E. coli K12 MG1655 is studied in ‘brain–heart infusion’ broth in a temperature controlled environment. Based on viable counts, ‘smooth’ growth curves are observed at 40, 41, 42 and 43°C. The exponential growth phase at 44 and 45°C is interrupted. At 46°C, a period of exponential growth is followed by inactivation. Neither the physiological state of the inoculum nor medium enrichment alters the dynamics, whilst temperature pre‐adaptation or chemical chaperones restore regular cell growth and division (‘smooth’ exponential growth).
Conclusions: Atypical, nonexponential growth at 44, 45 and 46°C seems related to protein destabilization and can (partly) be restored by an appropriate medium design (i.e. addition of chemical chaperones) or temperature history (i.e. selection of a more resistant subpopulation).
Significance and Impact of the Study: This study indicates that the maximum temperature for growth is dependent on the temperature history and the chemical environment. These observations and the nonexponential kinetics have important implications for the development of predictive models for food safety and quality.
This document contains the post-print pdf-version of the refereed paper: "Optimal experiment design for dynamic bioprocesses: a multiobjective approach" by Dries Telen, Filip Logist, Eva Van Derlinden, Ignace Tack and Jan Van Impe which has been archived in the university repository Lirias (https://lirias.kuleuven.be/) of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The content is identical to the content of the published paper, but without the final typesetting by the publisher.
Predictive microbiology has recently acknowledged the impact of the solid(like) food structure on microbial behavior. The presence of this solid(like) structure causes microorganisms to grow as colonies and no longer planktonically as in liquid. In this paper, the growth dynamics of Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli were studied as a function of temperature, considering different growth morphologies, i.e., (i) planktonic cells, (ii) immersed colonies and (iii) surface colonies. For all three growth morphologies, both microorganisms were grown in petri dishes. While E. coli was grown under optimal pH and water activity (aw), for S. Typhimurium pH and aw were adapted to 5.5 and 0.990. In order to mimic a solid(like) environment, 5% (w/v) gelatin was added. All petri dishes were incubated under static conditions at temperatures in the range [8.0°C-22.0°C]. Cell density was determined via viable plate counting. This work demonstrates that the growth morphology (planktonic vs. colony) has a negligible effect on the growth dynamics as a function of temperature. The observation of almost equal growth rates for planktonic cultures and colonies is in contrast to literature where, mostly, a difference is observed, i.e., μplanktonic cells≥μimmersed colonies≥μsurface colonies. This difference might be due to shaking of the liquid culture in these studies, which results in a nutrient and oxygen rich environment, in contrast to the diffusion-limited gel system. Experiments also indicate that lag phases for solid(like) systems are similar to those for the planktonic cultures, as can be found in literature for similar growth conditions. Considering the maximum cell density, no clear trend was deducted for either of the microorganisms. This study indicates that the growth parameters in the suboptimal temperature range do not depend on the growth morphology. For the considered experimental conditions, models previously developed for liquid environments can be used for solid(like) systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.