No abstract

Rats, reinforced for spacing their responses 20 seconds apart, used water-drinking as a means of "pacing" their response rate. "Timing" may be based on mediating response sequences such as drinking.

Two pigeons were exposed to several fixed-interval schedules of food reinforcement. In some cases, exteroceptive stimuli associated with the passage of time were present. Such visual "clock" stimuli were found to gain almost complete control over the behavior, although at the longest fixed interval studied, the superposition of a new temporal discrimination upon the visual discrimination was observed. Where clock stimuli were made contingent upon the birds' behavior, a new form of responding was generated. This behavior was discussed in terms of positive and negative response-tendencies resulting from several stimulus factors: Some of these functioned as S(Delta)'s and secondary negative reinforcers; some functioned as S(D)'s and secondary positive reinforcers; and some were ambiguous with respect to reinforcement conditions. A "pure temporal" discrimination was superimposed upon these factors, but its exact nature was indeterminate from the present data.

Three adult, food-deprived rats were given IP injections of dl-amphetamine sulfate under DRL and concurrent VI DRL reinforcement schedules. The drug results were as follows.(1) The IRT distributions of DRL responses shifted to the left, but some temporal discrimination remained. (2) The IRT distributions of VI responses shifted slightly to the left. (3) The distinguishing characteristics of VI and DRL IRT distributions were preserved. (4) The frequency distribution of number of VI responses between two consecutive DRL responses was relatively unaffected. (5) Over-all response rates on the two components of the concurrent schedules increased more or less proportionately.These findings imply that the primary behavioral effect of dl-amphetamine was a motor excitatory one. The drug's disruption of timing behavior was not due to a derangement of internal timing mechanisms, nor to interference with the topography or pattern of behavior. Rather, it might be a secondary result of the accelerated emission of overt behavior patterns mediating the temporal spacing of DRL bar presses.