A large eddy simulation (LES) a posteriori study is conducted for a temporal mixing layer which initially contains different species in the lower and upper streams and in which the initial pressure is larger than the critical pressure of either species. A vorticity perturbation, initially imposed, promotes roll-up and a double pairing of four initial spanwise vortices to reach a transitional state. The LES equations consist of the differential conservation equations coupled with a real-gas equation of state, and the equations utilize transport properties depending on the thermodynamic variables. Unlike all LES models to date, the differential equations contain, additional to the subgrid-scale (SGS) fluxes, a new SGS term denoted a 'pressure correction' (p correction) in the momentum equation. This additional term results from filtering the Navier-Stokes equations and represents the gradient of the difference between the filtered p and p computed from the filtered flow field. A previous a priori analysis, using a direct numerical simulation (DNS) database for the same configuration, found this term to be of leading order in the momentum equation, a fact traced to the existence of regions of high density-gradient magnitude that populated the entire flow; in that study, the appropriateness of several SGS-flux models was assessed, and a model for the p-correction term was proposed.In the present study, the constant-coefficient SGS-flux models of the a priori investigation are tested a posteriori in LES devoid of, or including, the SGS pcorrection term. A new p-correction model, different from that of the a priori study, is used, and the results of the two p-correction models are compared. The results reveal that the former is less computationally intensive and more accurate than the latter in reproducing global and structural features of the flow. The constantcoefficient SGS-flux models encompass the Smagorinsky (SMC) model, in conjunction with the Yoshizawa (YO) model for the trace, the gradient (GRC) model and the scale similarity (SSC) models, all exercised with the a priori study constant-coefficient values calibrated at the transitional state. Further, dynamic SGS-flux model LESs are performed with the p correction included in all cases. The dynamic models are the Smagorinsky (SMD) model, in conjunction with the YO model, the gradient (GRD) model and 'mixed' models using SMD in combination with GRC or SSC utilized with their theoretical coefficient values. The LES comparison is performed with the filtered-and-coarsened DNS (FC-DNS) which represents an ideal LES solution. The constant-coefficient models including the p correction (SMCP, GRCP and SSCP) † Email address for correspondence: josette.bellan@jpl.nasa.gov 212 E. S. Taskinoglu and J. Bellan are substantially superior to those devoid of it; the SSCP model produces the best agreement with the FC-DNS template. For duplicating the local flow structure, the predictive superiority of the dynamic mixed models is demonstrated over the SMD model; however, even be...
For flows at supercritical pressure, p, the large-eddy simulation (LES) equations consist of the differential conservation equations coupled with a real-gas equation of state, and the equations utilize transport properties depending on the thermodynamic variables. Compared to previous LES models, the differential equations contain not only the subgrid-scale (SGS) fluxes but also new SGS terms, each denoted as a 'correction'. These additional terms, typically assumed null for atmospheric pressure flows, stem from filtering the differential governing equations and represent differences, other than contributed by the convection terms, between a filtered term and the same term computed as a function of the filtered flow field. In particular, the energy equation contains a heat-flux correction (q-correction) which is the difference between the filtered divergence of the molecular heat flux and the divergence of the molecular heat flux computed as a function of the filtered flow field. We revisit here a previous a priori study where we only had partial success in modelling the q-correction term and show that success can be achieved using a different modelling approach. This a priori analysis, based on a temporal mixing-layer direct numerical simulation database, shows that the focus in modelling the q-correction should be on reconstructing the primitive variable gradients rather than their coefficients, and proposes the approximate deconvolution model (ADM) as an effective means of flow field reconstruction for LES molecular heat-flux calculation. Furthermore, an a posteriori study is conducted for temporal mixing layers initially containing oxygen (O) in the lower stream and hydrogen (H) or helium (He) in the upper stream to examine the benefit of the new model. Results show that for any LES including SGS-flux models (constant-coefficient gradient or scale-similarity models; dynamic-coefficient Smagorinsky/Yoshizawa or mixed Smagorinsky/Yoshizawa/gradient models), the inclusion of the q-correction in LES leads to the theoretical maximum reduction of the SGS molecular heat-flux difference; the remaining error in modelling this new subgrid term is thus irreducible. The impact of the q-correction model first on the molecular heat flux and then on the mean, fluctuations, second-order correlations and spatial distribution of dependent variables is also demonstrated. Discussions on the utilization of the models in general LES are presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.