Hysteroscopy is a significantly more accurate diagnostic method for the detection of endometrial pathology than TVS, has better specificity, and should be considered for all patients with AUB with an endometrial thickness of more than 4 mm. Hysteroscopy shows great efficiency in the diagnosis of focal abnormalities of the endometrium, which are unlikely recognized by ultrasonography and should be indicated in cases of AUB with an endometrial thickness less than 4 mm on ultrasonography because of the possibility of missing infrequent (0.8%) but relevant endometrial pathologies. Among such women showing abnormal or suspicious lesions, it is necessary to perform hysteroscopy with eye-directed biopsy because some cases of endometrial carcinoma could be missed.
The bladder-flap hematoma (BFH) is an unusual complication of the cesarean section (CS) performed by Misgaw Ladach method or Stark CS (performed without peritoneal closure) and it is an usual event after the visceral peritoneal closure performed during the traditional method. A BFH is generally thought of as a blood collection located in a space placed between the bladder and lower uterine segment (LUS), called vescico-uterine space. If, during a Stark CS, pathological fluid collections arise in this space by uterine suture bleeding, these decant into the large peritoneal cavity causing a hemoperitoneum. This last complication can be easily and accurately detectable by ultrasonography, which can be utilised by non-invasive monitoring as a guide for the clinical follow-up. In the authors' experience, the CS by Stark method is associated with a lower febrile and infective morbidity and it is possible also to perform a successful conservative laparoscopy for the BFH management. Laparoscopical treatment of BFH offers to patients the potential clinical benefits of the minimally invasive endoscopical treatments, but it should be reserved for surgeons trained in extensive laparoscopic procedures.
In our opinion, conservative laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumors is an appropriate and reasonable therapeutic option for young women with low-stage disease who wish to preserve their childbearing potential, because the fertility results are encouraging. Recurrence can be noted after this type of treatment, but the cases of recurrent disease can be detected with close follow-up and treated accordingly. Careful selection of candidates for this kind of treatment is, of course, necessary, and close follow-up is required.
The intrauterine devices (IUD) is a contraceptive method largely used as an effective, safe and economic method of contraception; IUD efficacy is demonstrated to be about 97%, and copper IUD contraceptive failure frequency is about 0.8% for the first year of use, and this is about 0.1-0.2% for the progestin IUD. IUD benefits are different; it produces a well-defined contraceptive efficacy for long time, is useful for sexual activity and is rather free from common problems. However, IUD utilization is associated with an increasing risk of pelvic infection (0.5%) in the 8 years from initial use, and the common risk of pelvic inflammatory infection (PID) is about one to two cases per year; this risk, for copper IUD users, is 0.2-0.5% per year. The possible side effects of IUD use are: pelvic pain, irregular meshes, infections, bleeding and uterine perforation; we report a uterine perforation due to IUD migration in the Retzius space, diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasonography, confirmed on CT and removed by laparoscopy. In any case, the IUD remains the mainstay of family planning measures in developing countries but, unfortunately, its association with possible serious complications, change the cost-benefit link and restrict its utilization by a large part of the general population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.