Considerable evidence has accumulated describing a complex interaction between the dopaminergic and glutamatergic pathways. Efforts to describe the mechanisms underlying this complex interaction have implicated a functional interaction between dopamine and glutamate receptors. Classically, the interaction between D(1) and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors has been proposed to involve the activation of second-messenger signalling cascades after receptor stimulation. However, in recent years, another paradigm has emerged which involves the direct interaction between D(1) and NMDA receptors. The physical association between D(1) and NMDA receptors is unique in that two different regions of the D(1) C-terminus are able to couple specifically and physically with two different NMDA subunits. The selective modulation of multiple NMDA receptor-mediated functions by direct interactions with D(1) receptors may form a new avenue to identify specific targets for therapeutics to modulate NMDA receptor-governed synaptic plasticity, neuronal development and disease states.
In line with the observed structural similarity to the fMLR, the flcMLR exhibited affinities for ML, 6-CI-ML and 6-OH-ML ~10-fold lower than mammalian receptors. Functionally, opposing interactions between ML and dopamine receptor signal transduction pathways were observed with ML potently inhibiting dopamine D1 A-receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation in cells (HEK-293) transiently co-expressing these receptors. ¢MLR mRNAs were found expressed in chicken brain and kidney with trace levels observed in the lung. The availability of cloned vertebrate MLRs distinct at both the amino acid and pharmacological level from their mammalian counterparts may now allow for the identification of those amino-acid residues and structural motifs that regulate ML-binding specificity and affinity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.