Objective-To examine whether intrapartum care and delivery oflow risk women in a midwife managed delivery unit differs from that in a consultant led labour ward.Design-Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio between the midwives unit and the labour ward.Setting-Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Grampian. Subjects-2844 low risk women, as defined by existing booking criteria for general practitioner units in Grampian. 1900 women were randomised to the midwives unit and 944 to the labour ward.Main outcome measures-Maternal and perinatal morbidity.Results-Of the women randomised to the midwives unit, 647 (34%) were transferred to the labour ward antepartum, 303 (16%) were transferred intrapartum, and 80 (40/%) were lost to follow up. 870 women (46%) were delivered in the midwives unit. Primigravid women (255/596, 43%) were significantly more likely to be transferred intrapartum than multigravid women (48/577, 8%). Significant differences between the midwives unit and labour ward were found in monitoring, fetal distress, analgesia, mobility, and use of episiotomy. There were no significant differences in mode of delivery or fetal outcome. Conclusions-Midwife managed intrapartum carefor low risk women results in more mobility and less intervention with no increase in neonatal morbidity. However, the high rate of transfer shows that antenatal criteria are unable to determine who will remain at low risk throughout pregnancy and labour. IntroductionIf women are to have choice in the location for their delivery, the maternity services must provide a safe and acceptable range of options. In Aberdeen we have developed a midwife managed delivery unit that aims

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract