Ten patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), (4 pneumonia, 4 sepsis, 2 polytrauma), underwent computerized tomography (CT) of the lungs, (apex, hilum, base), at 5, 10, 15 cm H2O positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). The ARF lungs, on CT scan, appeared as a patchwork of normal and dense areas with generally well defined boundaries. Most of the densities were found in the dependent regions. The areas of density were correlated with PaO2 (r = 0.51). The PEEP increase resulted in a significant expansion of total cross-sectional lung surface area. The dense areas decreased significantly at the hilum and base when increasing PEEP while the changes at the apex were not significant. The changes of density with PEEP were highly correlated with the changes in oxygenation (r = 0.91). In the individual patient, however, the modifications of gas exchange can not be entirely predicted from morphological changes, possibly due to a diversion of pulmonary blood flow.
Forty-three patients were entered in an uncontrolled study designed to evaluate extracorporeal membrane lung support in severe acute respiratory failure of parenchymal origin. Most of the metabolic carbon dioxide production was cleared through a low-flow venovenous bypass. To avoid lung injury from conventional mechanical ventilation, the lungs were kept "at rest" (three to five breaths per minute) at a low peak airway pressure of 35 to 45 cm H2O (3.4 to 4.4 kPa). The entry criteria were based on gas exchange under standard ventilatory conditions (expected mortality rate, greater than 90%). Lung function improved in thirty-one patients (72.8%), and 21 patients (48.8%) eventually survived. The mean time on bypass for the survivors was 5.4 +/- 3.5 days. Improvement in lung function, when present, always occurred within 48 hours. Blood loss averaged 1800 +/- 850 mL/d. No major technical accidents occurred in more than 8000 hours of perfusion. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal with low-frequency ventilation proved a safe technique, and we suggest it as a valuable tool and an alternative to treating severe acute respiratory failure by conventional means.
Objectives
CrossFit comprises a set of high-intensity, high-impact exercises that includes movements that may increase intra-abdominal pressure and cause involuntary loss of urine. There is scant literature about the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in female crossfitters, as well as its associated factors.
Methods
A population-based Internet survey stored in a website created with information on the benefits and risks of CrossFit for women’s health (https://crosscontinencebr.wixsite.com/crosscontinencebr) invited female crossfitters. In total, 551 women answered an online questionnaire, and the demographic variables (age, marital status, and parity), anthropometric data (weight, height, and body mass index), and the presence of UI during exercises were also investigated. The prevalence of UI and its associated factors were calculated using a logistic regression model. The significance level was set at 5%.
Results
The overall prevalence of UI during CrossFit exercises was 29.95%, and most women with UI reported loss of urine during at least one exercise (16.70%). Women with UI were older (33.77 ± 8.03 years) than those without UI (30.63 ± 6.93 years; P < 0.001). Double under (20.15%) and single under (7.99%) were the exercises that were most frequently associated with UI and also the only variables that remained in the final model that caused UI. The duration of CrossFit practice, number of days per week practicing CrossFit, daily time practice, previous vaginal delivery, and mean birth weight were not statistically associated with UI.
Conclusions
One-third of female crossfitters presented with UI during exercise. Double under was the exercise that was the most associated with UI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.