No abstract

In our study HRQoL measured in elderly inpatients with atrial fibrillation as compared with matched controlled was mainly altered in the "psychological" domains of the Duke Health Profile. From the patient's point of view, atrial fibrillation appears to have more mental than physical consequences. This study pointed out the utility to assess HRQoL in the management and treatment of elderly hospitalised atrial fibrillation patients.

No abstract

This study aims to describe the level of satisfaction of patients and their families, according to the type of hospital and the sociodemographic characteristics of patients hospitalised within Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam. The study is supported by a sample of 538 patients and their families from all of the hospitals in HCMC to whom an evaluation questionnaire was given to be filled out on the day of their release. The average age is 39, and 64.4% are women. The scores measuring the level of satisfaction vary from 57.7 to 90.7 points (on a scale of 0 to 100). The section under the heading "treatment provided by the doctors" received the highest scores (90.7/100). Dissatisfaction was primarily associated with factors such as the amount of time spent waiting, the behaviour of the hospital staff, cleanliness, the cafeteria and parking for motorbikes. Almost 100% of the patients spoke about their experiences during their stay in the hospital, and 50.2% had some negative opinions (1.042 complaints registered). The older patients, having a lower level of education and living either in other cities or in the rural region of HCMC, tented to be more satisfied than the younger patients, possessing higher levels of education and generally residing in the sub-urban or urban regions of HCMC. The patients who judged their condition to be very serious and their problems bad enough to justify hospitalisation, and who also felt that their health and condition had improved at the time of release compared to the time of admission were more satisfied than the other patients. Patients hospitalised who had an individual private room in a specialised hospital tended to be more satisfied that those who had a room sharing many beds for several patients in either a general hospital or in the emergency area of a specialised hospital. The authors observed no correlation between the level of satisfaction and the patient's gender. The results of this study have highlighed that certain domains, notably hat of the hospital's environment, should be reviewed and examined by health care administrators and managers in order to ensure the quality of the patient's care and coverage.

BackgroundAlthough the outcomes of health promotion and prevention programmes may depend on the level of intervention, studies and trials often fail to take it into account. The objective of this work was to develop a framework within which to consider the implementation of interventions, and to propose a tool with which to measure the quantity and the quality of activities, whether planned or not, relevant to the intervention under investigation. The framework and the tool were applied to data from the diet and physical activity promotion PRALIMAP trial.MethodsA framework allowing for calculation of an intervention dose in any health promotion programme was developed. A literature reviews revealed several relevant concepts that were considered in greater detail by a multidisciplinary working group. A method was devised with which to calculate the dose of intervention planned and that is actually received (programme-driven activities dose), as well as the amount of non-planned intervention (non-programme-driven activities dose).ResultsIndicators cover the roles of all those involved (supervisors, anchor personnel as receivers and providers, targets), in each intervention-related groups (IRG: basic setting in which a given intervention is planned by the programme and may differ in implementation level) and for every intervention period. All indicators are described according to two domains (delivery, participation) in two declensions (quantity and quality). Application to PRALIMAP data revealed important inter- and intra-IRG variability in intervention dose.ConclusionsA literature analysis shows that the terminology in this area is not yet consolidated and that research is ongoing. The present work provides a methodological framework by specifying concepts, by defining new constructs and by developing multiple information synthesis methods which must be introduced from the programme's conception. Application to PRALIMAP underlined the feasibility of measuring the implementation level. The framework and the tool can be used in any complex programme evaluation. The intervention doses obtained could be particularly useful in comparative trials.Trial registrationPRALIMAP is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT00814554