No abstract

Abnormal patellofemoral joint motion is a possible cause of patellofemoral pain, and patellar braces are thought to alleviate pain by restoring normal joint kinematics. We evaluated whether females with patellofemoral pain exhibit abnormal patellofemoral joint kinematics during dynamic, weight-bearing knee extension and assessed the effects of knee braces on patellofemoral motion. Real-time magnetic resonance (MR) images of the patellofemoral joints of 36 female volunteers (13 pain-free controls, 23 patellofemoral pain) were acquired during weight-bearing knee extension. Pain subjects were also imaged while wearing a patellar-stabilizing brace and a patellar sleeve. We measured axial-plane kinematics from the images. Females with patellofemoral pain exhibited increased lateral translation of the patella for knee flexion angles between 08and 508 (p ¼ 0.03), and increased lateral tilt for knee flexion angles between 08 and 208 (p ¼ 0.04). The brace and sleeve reduced the lateral translation of the patella; however, the brace reduced lateral displacement more than the sleeve (p ¼ 0.006). The brace reduced patellar tilt near full extension (p ¼ 0.001), while the sleeve had no effect on patellar tilt. Our results indicate that some subjects with patellofemoral pain exhibit abnormal weight-bearing joint kinematics and that braces may be effective in reducing patellar maltracking in these subjects. ß

. Roberto Ezequiel Heymann and Eduardo dos Santos Paiva received honorariums from Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer, Apsen, and Pfizer for speeches and consulting services; Milton Helfenstein Junior received honorariums from Pfizer and Merck Sharp for speeches and consulting services; Daniel Feldman Pollak received honorariums from Lilly, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp; José Eduardo Martinez received honorariums from Sanofi Aventis, for speeches, and Pfizzer, for speeches and consulting services; José Roberto Provenza received honorariums from Roche, Bristol, Ache, and Pfizer to participate in clinical studies with new drugs at PUC-Campinas; Marcelo Cruz Rezende received honorariums from LillyBoehringer, to participate in symposiums, and from Pfizer, for speeches and to participate in sympostiums; valério valim Cristo received honorariums from Roche for presentations, conferences, or speeches, besides financing for studies, teaching organization, or to attend symposiums sponsored by Lilly, Genzyme, and Schering-Plough.

A TCI can be used to reduce pain while walking and to increase walking distance in individuals with PF.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire on specific knowledge about low back pain entitled “The Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire”.INTRODUCTION:There is a need for instruments to assess patient knowledge regarding chronic illness. Such methods can contribute to the education of patients.METHODS:The Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire was developed through five focus groups. The questionnaire was distributed to 50 patients to assess their comprehension of the terms. To assess the reproducibility, 20 patients were surveyed by two different interviewers on the same day and twice by a single interviewer with a one-to-two week interval. For the construct validation, the Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire was given to 20 healthcare professionals with knowledge on low back pain and 20 patients to determine whether the questionnaire would discriminate between the two different populations. To assess the sensitivity of the questionnaire to changes in the knowledge level of the patients, it was given to 60 patients who were randomly assigned to the Intervention Group and the Control Group. The Intervention Group answered the questionnaire both before and after attending a chronic back pain educational program (back school), whereas the Control Group answered the questionnaire twice with an interval of one month and no educational intervention.RESULTS:The focus groups generated a questionnaire with 16 items. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient and the intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.95 in the assessments of the intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility (p< 0.01). In the construct validation, the healthcare professionals and patients showed statistically different scores (p< 0.001). In the phase regarding the sensitivity to change, the Intervention Group exhibited a significant increase in their specific knowledge over the Control Group (p< 0.001).CONCLUSION:The Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire was validated and proved to be reproducible, valid and sensitive to changes in patient knowledge.