Motion artifacts are a significant source of noise in many functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) experiments. Despite this, there is no well-established method for their removal. Instead, functional trials of fNIRS data containing a motion artifact are often rejected completely. However, in most experimental circumstances the number of trials is limited, and multiple motion artifacts are common, particularly in challenging populations. Many methods have been proposed recently to correct for motion artifacts, including principle component analysis, spline interpolation, Kalman filtering, wavelet filtering and correlation-based signal improvement. The performance of different techniques has been often compared in simulations, but only rarely has it been assessed on real functional data. Here, we compare the performance of these motion correction techniques on real functional data acquired during a cognitive task, which required the participant to speak aloud, leading to a low-frequency, low-amplitude motion artifact that is correlated with the hemodynamic response. To compare the efficacy of these methods, objective metrics related to the physiology of the hemodynamic response have been derived. Our results show that it is always better to correct for motion artifacts than reject trials, and that wavelet filtering is the most effective approach to correcting this type of artifact, reducing the area under the curve where the artifact is present in 93% of the cases. Our results therefore support previous studies that have shown wavelet filtering to be the most promising and powerful technique for the correction of motion artifacts in fNIRS data. The analyses performed here can serve as a guide for others to objectively test the impact of different motion correction algorithms and therefore select the most appropriate for the analysis of their own fNIRS experiment.

PURPOSE. An algorithm and a computer program for the automatic grading of corneal nerve tortuosity are proposed and evaluated. METHODS. Thirty images of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus with different grades of tortuosity were acquired with a scanning laser confocal microscope in normal and pathologic subjects. Nerves were automatically traced with an algorithm previously developed, and a tortuosity measure was computed with the proposed method, based on the number of changes in the curvature sign and on the amplitude (maximum distance of the curve from the underlying chord) of the nerve curves. These measures were evaluated according to their capability to reproduce the expert classification of images into three groups of tortuosity (low, mid, and high). This classification was also compared with measures provided by other methods proposed in the literature to evaluate nerve tortuosity. RESULTS. Among all considered methods, the one proposed herein allows a minimum of classification errors (only 2 in 30 images) and the highest Krippendorff concordance coefficient (0.96). Furthermore, it is the only one that can provide a significant difference (P < 0.01) between all pairs of tortuosity classes. CONCLUSIONS. The results provided by the proposed system confirmed its ability to perform a clinically significant evaluation of corneal nerve tortuosity.

Automatic and manual length estimations on the same image were very well correlated, indicating that the automatic procedure is capable of correctly reproducing the differences in nerve length between different subjects.

No abstract