No abstract

Gastric ulcer is a prevalent disease with various etiologies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), stress conditions, and alcohol, resulting in an inflammatory condition in the gastric mucosa. The aim of this study was to explore the protective effects of modafinil on gastric erosions induced by indomethacin, water-immersion stress, and alcohol in rats and to evaluate the role of nitric oxide (NO) pathway. Animals were allocated to the three experimental models of gastric ulcer – indomethacin (30 mg/kg PO), water-immersion stress, and ethanol (5 ml/kg PO). Induction of gastric ulcer in all models caused an increase in J-score (macroscopic assessment), biochemical markers, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), and myeloperoxidase (MPO), and microscopic destructions. Administration of modafinil (50 and 100 mg/kg i. p) significantly improved J-score in the indomethacin (P < 0.05) and stress models (P < 0.001). Moreover, the level of TNF-α IL-1β, and MPO was deceased after modafinil administration (P < 0.001). However, modafinil did not have any effects on gastric injury induced by ethanol. In addition, co-administration of L-NAME (a non-specific NO synthase inhibitor) and aminoguanidine (an inducible NO synthase inhibitor) with modafinil significantly neutralized the gastroprotective effect of modafinil in the indomethacin and water-immersion stress groups (P < 0.05, and P < 0.01; respectively), while 7-nitroindazole (a neuronal NO synthase inhibitor) did not show such reversing effects. In conclusion, modafinil possesses gastroprotective effects on the gastric lesions induced by indomethacin and stress, which are probably mediated via the inflammation inhibition and NO pathway modulation.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life‐threatening neurologic disorder that can be as both cause and consequence of neuroinflammation. In addition to previous reports on anti‐inflammatory property of the anti‐migraine medication sumatriptan, we have recently shown its anticonvulsive effects on pentylenetetrazole‐induced seizure in mice. In the present study, we investigated further (i) the effects of sumatriptan in the lithium–pilocarpine SE model in rats, and (ii) the possible involvement of nitric oxide (NO), 5‐hydroxytryptamin 1B/1D (5‐HT1B/1D) receptor, and inflammatory pathways in such effects of sumatriptan. Status epilepticus was induced by lithium chloride (127 mg/kg, i.p) and pilocarpine (60 mg/kg, i.p.) in Wistar rats. While SE induction increased SE scores and mortality rate, sumatriptan (0.001‐1 mg/kg, i.p.) improved it (P < 0.001). Administration of the selective 5‐HT1B/1D antagonist GR‐127935 (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the anticonvulsive effects of sumatriptan (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.). Although both tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and NO levels were markedly elevated in the rats' brain tissues post‐SE induction, pre‐treatment with sumatriptan significantly reduced both TNF‐α (P < 0.05) and NO (P < 0.001) levels. Combined GR‐127935 and sumatriptan treatment inhibited these anti‐inflammatory effects of sumatriptan, whereas combined non‐specific NOS (L‐NAME) or selective neuronal NOS (7‐nitroindazole) inhibitors and sumatriptan further reduced NO levels. In conclusion, sumatriptan exerted a protective effect against the clinical manifestations and mortality rate of SE in rats which is possibly through targeting 5‐HT1B/1D receptors, neuroinflammation, and nitrergic transmission.

Background and purpose: Status epilepticus is a severe neurological disorder that can be life-threatening. Thalidomide and its analogs have shown promising results to confront pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of three synthesized thalidomide derivatives on lithium-pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Experimental approach: To induce status epilepticus, rats received lithium chloride (127 mg/kg, i.p.) and pilocarpine HCl (60 mg/kg, i.p.) 20 h after lithium chloride injection. Thirty min before pilocarpine HCl administration, rats received hyoscine N-butyl bromide (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and concurrently one of the test compounds (5B, 5C, and 5D), diazepam, thalidomide, or vehicle (4% DMSO) to evaluate their anti-epileptic effects. Epileptic seizures scores were assessed through the Racine scale. Twenty-four h after injection of pilocarpine, brain samples were extracted for further histopathological evaluation. Findings/Results: Results revealed that among tested compounds (5B, 5C, and 5D), only compound 5C (1 mg/kg) exhibited excellent anti-epileptic activity comparable to diazepam (10 mg/kg). Compound 5D (100 mg/kg) only demonstrated comparable anti-epileptic activity to thalidomide (1 mg/kg). Compound 5B did not have any anti-epileptic activity even at the dose of 100 mg/kg. The histopathological survey showed that compound 5C has more neuroprotective effects than diazepam and thalidomide in the cortex of the brain. In the cornu ammonis 1 region, thalidomide had higher protective properties and in the cornu ammonis 3 and dentate gyrus areas, diazepam had higher efficacy to prevent necrosis. Conclusion and implications: Compound 5C is a good candidate for further studies regarding its potency, compared to thalidomide and diazepam.

No abstract