Background: Vaccination is the most effective way to fight the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect people who have a higher risk of developing severe illness and death from COVID-19 such as cancer patients. We aimed in this study to determine the acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination of the Salah Azaiez Institute (SAI) of cancer of Tunisia patients and to identify its associated factors. Methods: It was a cross sectional study about patients admitted to the SAI for treatment during the month of February 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among Tunisian cancer patients. Results: A total of 200 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 54.4±12.7 years and a gender ratio of 0.5. Only 35.0% of surveyed patients reported their acceptance to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Multivariate analysis showed that believing in ), enrollment in the COVID-19 vaccine platform (OR=8. 3 [1.8-38.1]) and the willingness to receive influenza vaccine (OR=3.9 [1.6-9.3]) were independently associated with the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among SAI cancer patients. Conclusions: The COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate found in this study was low. Communication strategies of the vaccination campaigns should provide clear, simple and detailed messages about the efficacy and the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines. More engagement of health authorities to promote COVID-19 vaccination is necessary.
Background In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Vaccine literacy (VL) is considered as an important determinant of vaccine hesitancy and uptake. Cancer patients constitute a target group for COVID-19 vaccination. Thus, we aimed in this study to assess COVID-19 VL among cancer patients in Tunisia. Methods A cross sectional study was conducted, during the month of February 2021, in the Salah Azaiez institute of cancer including all inpatients aged ≥18 years. A standardized VL scale was used, composed of two dimensions: functional VL and interactive-critical VL, using a four point Likert scale. A global score was calculated for each scale (ranging from 1 to 4); A cutoff of 2.5 was defined according to the literature. The students' t and Anova tests were used for comparison of VL mean scores according to the studied characteristics. A p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results A total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 54.4±12.7 years. A low VL score (≤ 2.5) was observed among 27.5% and 81.0% participants for functional and interactive critical scales respectively. Higher functional VL score was associated with a higher educational level (3.7±0.5 among individuals with a university degree level vs 2.5±1.2 among illiterate, p < 0.001). Interactive critical VL significantly increased with educational level (p < 0.001) and was significantly higher among healthcare workers (2.5±1.3 vs 1.7± 0.9, p < 0.001), those who accepted to get the COVID-19 vaccine (2.0±0.9 vs 1.6±0.8, p = 0.002), who did not believe that vaccines are unsafe (1.9±0.9 vs 1.4±0.7, p < 0.001) and that there is no need to be vaccinated since natural immunity exists (2.1±1.0 vs 1.7±0.8,p=0.016). Conclusions Vaccine literacy among cancer patients included in this study is weak. Effective communication strategies about COVID-19 vaccination should build VL and consider the level of patient's health literacy to redress vaccine hesitancy and uptake. Key messages This study showed a low interactive-critical vaccine literacy score. Communication strategies in vaccination campaigns should be aligned with people’s vaccine literacy.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. The most frequent metastatic sites are lung, bone, liver and brain. On the other hand, gastric metastases are rare. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) occurs rarely. Lobular carcinoma is the histological type most often associated with bilateral breast carcinomas and gastric metastases. We made a retrospective study including four patients followed in the Salah Azaiez Institute, for a bilateral breast cancer with gastric metastases. We analyzed the epidemiological, anatomoclinical and therapeutic particularities of this rare entity. Symptoms were unspecific. The diagnosis of gastric metastasis of the SBBC was confirmed by a histopathological examination of an endoscopic biopsy. The median age was 46.2 years (range, 36-51 years) and the median time until the gastric involvement was 19 months (range, 0-41 months). None of patients had a surgical treatment for the gastric location. All Patients received at least one line of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Median survival following the detection of gastric involvement was 22 months (range, 1-56 months). Gastric metastases from breast cancer are rare and frequently associated with other distant metastasis. Symptoms are unspecific and endoscopy may not be contributive. Therefore, gastric involvement is underestimated. Lobular infiltrating carcinoma (LIC) is the most histological type incriminated in its occurrence. The supply of immunohistochemistry is crucial to distinguish between primary or metastatic gastric cancer.
Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract. The majority of cases are adenocarcinoma (AC). Pure squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of gallbladder accounts only 3% of the malignant neoplasm of this organ. Many patients are at advanced stage when diagnosed and have bad therapeutic efficacy. At present, radical surgery is the only chance to gain long-term survival for patients with early-stage gallbladder cancers. Recent reports have shown a benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation in this type of tumor. At present, no therapy is defined for unresectable cancer of the gallbladder, especially for SCC.
Background Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is the most effective way to stop the pandemic and to avoid its related deaths. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, represent now a major hurdle to achieve herd immunity. Cancer patients constitute a prioritized group for COVID-19 vaccination as they are particularly vulnerable to severe infection and death. The aim of this study was to assess vaccine hesitancy among cancer patients of the Salah Azaiez Institute (SAI) of cancer and to identify its knowledge and attitudes associated factors. Methods A cross sectional study was conducted among all inpatients aged above 18 years old during the month of February 2021. Participants were asked according to a well-structured questionnaire about knowledge (vaccine literacy) and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine literacy was assed using two scales (functional and interactive-critical scales) for which a global score was calculated ranging from 1 to 4. A lower score corresponding to lower vaccine literacy. Chi square test and student's t test were used to identify knowledge and attitudes associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. A p value equal or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Two hundred cancer patients were included with a mean age of 54.4±12.7 and a gender ratio equal to 0.5. Sixty-five percent reported that they would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine hesitancy was associated with lower interactive vaccine literacy score (1.6±0.8 vs 2.0, p = 0.002), skepticism regarding COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety (73.8% vs 38.5%, p < 0.001) and believing that health authorities will not be able to vaccinate the majority of the population (71,2% vs 55.7% p = 0.037). Conclusions The proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among cancer patients is high. Mass media campaigns for vaccine promotion should be enhanced. Physicians and health care workers play a key role in increasing acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccine among high risk patients. Key messages Majority of cancer patients were unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Patient education about the benefits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should be an integral part of oncology visits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.