Polymer flooding technology is widely used to enhance the oil recovery, but it increases the viscosity of the produced liquid, making the subsequent water treatment more challenging. Application of polymers impacts separation performance of hydrocyclone, which is an important equipment of produced liquid preseparation and sewage treatment in oil fields. In this work, the effect of polymer solution concentrations on the separation performance of hydrocyclone was studied by using sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity was calculated by numerical simulation, and the influence of polymer concentration on velocity field, pressure field, oil volume fraction, and separation efficiency of hydrocyclone was evaluated. The prototype was processed according to the similarity principle of fluid mechanics, and the relevant laboratory tests were carried out to verify the accuracy of simulation results. Within the tested range (100‐1000 mg/L), the increase of polymer solution concentrations caused adverse impacts on the velocity field, pressure field, and oil volume fraction of the hydrocyclone. When the concentrations of polymer solution reached 800 mg/L, the separation efficiency was reduced to less than 60%. The sensitivity sequence obtained by calculation is as follows: underflow outlet pressure drop > overflow outlet pressure drop > axial velocity > radial velocity > tangential velocity > pressure drop ratio. The change of pressure drop at underflow and overflow outlets was the primary cause for poor separation performance of hydrocyclone. The work can be used to guide the design and application of hydrocyclone for efficient treatment of polymer‐containing treatment liquid.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.