Bone density assessment using CBCT is an efficient method and significantly correlated with implant stability parameters and Lekholm and Zarb index. Thus, it is possible to predict initial implant stability and possibility of immediate or early loading using CBCT scans prior to implant placement.

No abstract

In conclusion, KT in combination with counseling and exercise is more effective than counseling and exercise alone in TMDs.

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate whether preoperative bone density value derived from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) gives predictable data about primary and secondary stability characteristics of immediately loaded dental implants under different clinical variables. A total of 77 immediately loaded implants placed in 23 patients were included the study. Bone density values of the implant recipient sites were recorded using CBCT. The maximum insertion torque values (ITVs) of the implants were recorded using a digital torque meter during surgery. Resonance frequency measurements were taken using the Osstell Mentor at 4 time points; immediately after surgery (implant stability quotient [ISQ]0) and after 1 (ISQ1), 3 months (ISQ3), and 12 months (ISQ12) of loading. Data were analyzed statistically. The mean bone density and ITVs of all implants were 565 ± 81 and 36.8 ± 3.8 N · cm, respectively. The mean ISQ values were 73.6 ± 5.8 at baseline, 71.1 ± 6.5 after 1 month, 74.8 ± 5.6 after 3 months, and 76.6 ± 5.1 after 12 months of loading. Statistically significant differences were observed between ISQ0 and ISQ1 (P < 0.001), and ISQ0 and ISQ12 (P < 0.001), but not between ISQ0 and ISQ3 (P > 0.05). In regard to stability changes over time, statistically significant correlations were found between bone density values from CBCT and ISQ follow-up measurements, and between ITV and ISQ follow-up measurements in all examination periods. Thus, it is possible to predict primary and secondary stability characteristics of immediately loaded implants by using preoperative CBCT scan and perioperative ITV.

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare autogenous and allograft bone rings in surgically created vertical bone defects. Material and methods Four male, 1‐year‐old sheep were used in this study. In each sheep, eight vertical bone defects 7 mm in diameter were created using trephine drill in the iliac wing. Autogenous and allograft bone rings 5 mm in height and 7 mm in diameter were used for vertical augmentation around implants. The study consisted of four groups according to the bone ring type and amount of vertical augmentation, autogenous 2 mm, allograft 2 mm, autogenous 4 mm, and allograft 4 mm. Two of the animals were sacrificed after 4 months, and the remaining two animals were sacrificed after 8 months. Undecalcified sections were prepared from harvested samples. Histological assessment and histomorphometric analysis were performed. Results Autogenous 2 mm group showed higher values than allograft 2 mm group, and autogenous 4 mm group showed higher values than allograft 4 mm group in terms of bone area and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) after 4 months. However, allograft 2 mm group showed higher bone area and BIC values than autogenous 2 mm group after 8 months. Also, autogenous 4 mm and allograft 4 mm groups showed comparable results after 8 months. Allograft 2 mm and allograft 4 mm groups showed higher bone area and BIC values at 8 months compared with 4 months. Conclusions Allograft bone ring looks promising in augmentation of surgically created vertical bone defects around implants after 8 months of healing.