No abstract

Despite the remarkable burden of dysphagia, appropriate multidisciplinary management is lacking in Iran and patients are often deprived of effective treatments. Obtaining a full understanding of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of healthcare providers is necessary to determine the gaps in improvement of the quality of care for dysphagic patients. A questionnaire was designed covering demographic information and the parameters of KAP. Face and content validity were determined. Test-retest reliability confirmed that the questionnaire scores are stable over time (r = 0.77, p value < 0.01). Participants were healthcare providers employed in university-affiliated hospitals in three major cities of Iran; Tehran, Shiraz and Mashhad. In total, 312 healthcare professionals completed our survey. The majority (96.8%) were familiar with the term "dysphagia or swallowing disorders". Most of the participants believed their profession (88.5%), as well as other disciplines (92.3%) can play an important role in the management of dysphagia; and this problem should be recognized in a multidisciplinary manner (96.2%). Also, 60.9% had encountered a patient with dysphagia. 52.2% had used at least one assessment method, while 49.9% had applied at least one treatment method. However, very few participants were familiar with a standard test for screening and assessment of dysphagia (11.9%). 74.7% were willing to participate in a workshop on dysphagia. As the main pitfalls of care lie in diagnosis and treatment expertise, the policy of hospitals should prioritize educating and updating the skills of healthcare professionals, encourage multidisciplinary teamwork, establishing clear guidelines and facilitate access to advanced tools.

Introduction Ozone has been recently used as a safe alternative treatment in musculoskeletal disorders with fewer adverse effects than corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single injection of ozone with that of a corticosteroid in the treatment of shoulder impingement. Design Thirty patients with shoulder pain and clinical signs and symptoms of impingement were randomly assigned into two groups: ultrasound-guided injection with ozone or corticosteroid. Patients’ symptoms were evaluated by visual analog scale, constant score, shoulder pain and disability scale, shoulder range of motion, and ultrasonographic measures before treatment, 2 wks, and 2 mos after injections. Results Patients’ visual analog scale, shoulder pain and disability scale and constant score improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001), but the benefits were in favor of corticosteroid group (P < 0.001). At intervals between the two follow-ups, an improvement was observed in the visual analog scale score among patients receiving ozone, whereas during the same interval, patients’ pain slightly worsened in the corticosteroid group. The range of motion and ultrasonographic measures did not show statistical differences between the two groups. Conclusions Corticosteroid injection improves the pain and disability scores more significantly than a one-time ozone injection. Ozone may serve as an alternative modality in treating shoulder impingement when the use of steroids is contraindicated.