The parameter sets used during the selective laser melting (SLM) process directly affect the final product through the resulting melt-pool temperature. Achieving the optimum set of parameters is usually done experimentally, which is a costly and time-consuming process. Additionally, controlling the deviation of the melt-pool temperature from the specified value during the process ensures that the final product has a homogeneous microstructure. This study proposes a multiphysics numerical model that explores the factors affecting the production of parts in the SLM process and the mathematical relationships between them, using stainless steel 316L powder. The effect of laser power and laser spot diameter on the temperature of the melt-pool at different scanning velocities were studied. Thus, mathematical expressions were obtained to relate process parameters to melt-pool temperature. The resulting mathematical relationships are the basic elements to design a controller to instantly control the melt-pool temperature during the process. In the study, test samples were produced using simulated parameters to validate the simulation approach. Samples produced using simulated parameter sets resulting in temperatures of 2000 K and above had acceptable microstructures. Evaporation defects caused by extreme temperatures, unmelted powder defects due to insufficient temperature, and homogenous microstructures for suitable parameter sets predicted by the simulations were obtained in the experimental results, and the model was validated.
For laser-melting deposition (LMD), a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed using the volume of fluid and discrete element modeling techniques. A method was developed to track the flow behavior, flow pattern, and driving forces of liquid flow. The developed model was compared with experimental results in the case of AISI 304 stainless steel single-track depositions on AISI 304 stainless steel substrate. A close correlation was found between experiments and modeling, with a deviation of 1–3%. It was found that the LMD involves the simultaneous addition of powder particles that absorb a significant amount of laser energy to transform their phase from solid to liquid, resulting in conduction-mode melt flow. The bubbles within the melt pool float at a specific velocity and escape from the melt pool throughout the deposition process. The pores are generated if the solid front hits the bubble before escaping the melt pool. Based on the simulations, it was discovered that the deposited layer’s counters took the longest time to solidify compared to the overall deposition. The bubbles strived to leave through the contours in an excess quantity, but became stuck during solidification, resulting in a large degree of porosity near the contours. The stream traces showed that the melt flow adopted a clockwise vortex in front of the laser beam and an anti-clockwise vortex behind the laser beam. The difference in the surface tension between the two ends of the melt pool induces “thermocapillary or Benard–Marangoni convection” force, which is insignificant compared to the selective laser melting process. After layer deposition, the melt region, mushy zone, and solidified region were identified. When the laser beam irradiates the substrate and powder particles are added simultaneously, the melt adopts a backwards flow due to the recoil pressure and thermocapillary or Benard–Marangoni convection effect, resulting in a negative mass flow rate. This study provides an in-depth understanding of melt pool dynamics and flow pattern in the case of LMD additive manufacturing technique.
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has a wide range of uses in high-tech industries, including the aerospace and biomedical fields. For LPBF, the flow of molten metal is crucial; until now, however, the flow in the melt pool has not been described thoroughly in 3D. Here, we provide full-field mapping and flow measurement of melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion, through a high-fidelity numerical model using the finite volume method. The influence of Marangoni flow, evaporation, as well as recoil pressure have been included in the model. Single-track experiments were conducted for validation. The temperature profiles at different power and speed parameters were simulated, and results were compared with experimental temperature recordings. The flow dynamics in a single track were exposed. The numerical and experimental findings revealed that even in the same melting track, the melt pool’s height and width can vary due to the strong Marangoni force. The model showed that the variation in density and volume for the same melting track was one of the critical reasons for defects. The acquired findings shed important light on laser additive manufacturing processes and pave the way for the development of robust, computational models with a high degree of reliability.
Laser melting deposition (LMD) has recently gained attention from the industrial sectors due to producing near-net-shape parts and repairing worn-out components. However, LMD remained unexplored concerning the melt pool dynamics and fluid flow analysis. In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and analytical models have been developed. The concepts of the volume of fluid and discrete element modeling were used for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Furthermore, a simplified mathematical model was devised for single-layer deposition with a laser beam attenuation ratio inherent to the LMD process. Both models were validated with the experimental results of Ti6Al4V alloy single track depositions on Ti6Al4V substrate. A close correlation has been found between experiments and modelling with a few deviations. In addition, a mechanism for tracking the melt flow and involved forces was devised. It was simulated that the LMD involves conduction-mode melt flow only due to the coaxial addition of powder particles. In front of the laser beam, the melt pool showed a clockwise vortex, while at the back of the laser spot location, it adopted an anti-clockwise vortex. During printing, a few partially melted particles tried to enter into the molten pool, causing splashing within the melt material. The melting regime, mushy area (solid + liquid mixture) and solidified region were determined after layer deposition. This research gives an in-depth insight into the melt flow dynamics in the context of LMD printing.
Purpose This paper aims to reduce part defects and improve ceramic additive manufacturing (AM). Selective laser melting (SLM) experiments were carried out to explore the effect of laser power and scanning speed on the microstructure, melting behaviour and surface roughness of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) ceramic. Design/methodology/approach The experiments were designed based on varying laser power and scanning speed. The laser power was changed between 50 W and 140 W, and the scanning speed was changed between 170 mm/s and 210 mm/s. Other parameters, such as scanning strategy, layer thickness and hatch spacing, remain constant. Findings Laser power and scan speed are the two important laser parameters of great significance in the SLM technique that directly affect the molten state of ceramic powders. The findings reveal that Cu2O part defects are widely controlled by gradually increasing the laser power to 110 W and reducing the scanning speed to 170 mm/s. Furthermore, excessive laser power (>120 W) caused surface roughness, cavities and porous microstructure due to the extremely high energy input of the laser beam. Originality/value The SLM technique was used to produce Cu2O ceramic specimens. SLM of oxide ceramic became feasible using a slurry-based approach. The causes of several part defects such as spattering effect, crack initiation and propagation, the formation of porous microstructure, surface roughness and asymmetrical grain growth during the SLM of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) are thoroughly investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.