The objective of partial nephrectomy is to treat the cancer while maximizing renal function preservation. Clamping the main vessels is done primarily to reduce the blood loss during partial nephrectomy; however, vascular clamping can compromise kidney function. In order to avoid clamping, various techniques have been described. Our analysis showed that techniques that avoid main renal artery clamping during RPN are associated with better renal function preservation, yet deliver non-inferior perioperative and oncological outcomes as compared with RPN procedures that clamp the main vessels.

The preoperative R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score can be used to predict postoperative pathologically determined healthy renal volume loss or NNPV removed. Removal of not just the tumor but also the healthy surrounding parenchyma is important in determining renal function decline. As our understanding of the importance of renal volume loss grows, NNPV removed gains increasing utility as an easily determinable postoperative variable.

Background:Low-dose aspirin use has been correlated with an increased risk of bleeding and overall complications in surgical and invasive diagnostic procedures. In this review, our aim was to analyze the current literature on whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is feasible and safe in patients taking low-dose aspirin perioperatively.Methods:A systematic review was performed identifying a total of 767 studies, published between January 2000 and September 2017, with five of these studies meeting the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis, totalizing 1481 patients underwent RARP. Patients were divided into two groups: taking aspirin (group A) and those not taking aspirin (group B) perioperatively.Results:There were no significant differences between groups in the overall [group A 10.7% versus group B 15.7%, risk ratio (RR) 0.83; p = 0.45; I2 = 0%] or major complication rates (group A 1% versus group B 3%, RR 0.98; p = 0.98; I² = 0%), rate of cardiovascular events (group A 1.4% and group B 0.5%, RR 2.06; p = 0.24; I2 = 9%), blood loss (group A 278 ml versus group B 307 ml, SMD −0.12; p = 0.91; I2 = 96%), or hospital length of stay [group A 4 days (3–5) and group B 4 days (3–4), SMD −0.09; p = 0.52; I² = 0%]. There was a slightly higher blood-transfusion rate in group A (2.6%) versus group B (1.6%) (RR, 5.05; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%).Conclusion:Continued aspirin use in the perioperative period does not correlate with an increase in surgical morbidity, blood loss, or hospital length of stay. There was a slightly higher blood-transfusion rate in patients taking low-dose aspirin (group A) perioperatively.

Treatment of renal cell carcinoma has evolved considerably over the last few years. While total nephrectomy is necessary at times, nephron-sparing surgery, with a goal of renal function preservation, should always be considered. Although open partial nephrectomy is considered the gold standard approach for nephron-sparing surgery, laparoscopic- or robotic-assisted techniques allow urologists to perform renal surgery less invasively, with excellent long-term oncological outcomes. Cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are less invasive management approaches for carefully selected patients with small renal masses. Active surveillance should be considered in elderly or patients who are unfit for surgery. Ultimately, the method chosen for management of a renal mass is an informed decision made by the physician and patient.

The case is of a 59-year-old male with history of severe ischemic colitis following emergent intervention for a ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm who subsequently underwent left hemicolectomy, partial proctectomy, and Hartmann colostomy. The patient later underwent reversal of the Hartmann colostomy with diverting ileostomy. The surgery was complicated by a right ureteral and posterior bladder injury that resulted in a large rectovesical fistula involving the right hemitrigone and right ureteral orifice. An attempt to repair the rectovesical fistula at an outside facility was unsuccessful. Then, he underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of rectovesical fistula, including simple prostatectomy, excision of rectovesical fistulous tract, rectal closure, peritoneal and omental flap interposition, bladder neck reconstruction, vesicourethral anastomosis and right ureteral reimplantation. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications, and the patient was discharged at postoperative day 4; cystoscopy at 6-week follow-up demonstrated a successful closure of the fistula, at which time the ureteral stents were removed.