The purpose of
this study is to examine the opinions of the teacher candidates about the
goals, implementation and outcomes of the Community Service Practices (CSP)
Course and to propose suggestions for a more effective teaching of the course.
This phenomenological study was carried out with seven teacher candidates in
their 3rd year and taking the Community Service Practices (CSP) Course in
Mersin University, Faculty of Education, English Language Teaching Department
in spring term of 2014-2015 academic year. A form consisting of nine open
ended questions which were prepared by the researchers and evaluated by two
experts for their validity was used to collect data about research problems. The
form also included closed-ended questions where participants were asked about
their demographic characteristics. The obtained data were analyzed by content
analysis technique. The data were classified according to their contents and
the themes were created. These themes were examined and compared by two
experts of educational science and then their reliability was calculated using
the formula "Reliability=(Number of Agreements/Total Number of Agreements
and Disagreement) x 100". The reliability coefficient calculated as 18 /
(18 + 3) * 100 = 85 shows that there is a reasonable consensus among the
experts and therefore the internal consistency of the study (Miles &
Huberman, 1994). The obtained data indicated that the course was overall
implemented in line with its goals. As for the achievement of the goals of the
course, many goals were considered to be attained because teacher candidates
stated that they had the chance to get to know the society better and to
integrate with it; cooperated with different institutions; strengthened the
emotional dimension and spirituality of the teaching profession; developed
self-confidence and socialized more. On the other hand, teacher candidates
also reported some issues related to the course. Bearing these findings in
mind, it can be concluded that teacher candidates found this course very
useful, and that some suggestions about the issues should be taken into
account so that the course could be implemented more productively.
This study aims to examine relationships among critical thinking dispositions, perceived problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness of gifted and talented students, and to test a structural equation model based on these relationships. The study was conducted using the correlational research design and the study group, which was selected by using convenience sampling method, consisted of 502 gifted and talented students who were registered to Science and Art Centers in Adana, Kayseri and Mersin, Turkey in 2016. The data were collected through use of Likert-type scales and analyzed using Lisrel 8.7 and IBM SPSS Amos 25 programs. Structural equation modeling was used to determine structural relationships among variables. The initial findings indicated that students had high levels of critical thinking dispositions, perceived problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness. The structural model, which was developed based on the relationships among these three variables, was confirmed. In light of the findings obtained from this model, it was revealed that 49% of the variance in students' perceived problem-solving skills was explained by their metacognitive awareness, and critical thinking disposition had a full mediation effect on the relationship between perceived problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness. These findings were discussed in context of the related literature and some suggestions for implementation and future research were presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.