No abstract

Background The importance of identifying osteoporotic vertebral endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF), which primarily includes endplate fracture (EPF) and vertebral anterior cortex buckling, has been recognized. However, some old traumatic ECFs with healing process in the elderly may be mistaken as osteoporotic. This study analyzes the radiological features of traumatic EPF. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 194 spine trauma patients with 263 vertebral fractures (mean age: 42.11 ± 9.82 years, 118 males and 76 females). All patients had traumatic EPF identified by X-ray/CT/MRI. Results The involved vertebra was mostly L1 (29.7%), followed by T12 and L2. Except EPFs involved both superior and inferior endplates (12.6%), only 1.9% involved inferior endplate alone, with the majority involved superior endplate. If each endplate was divided into five segments of equal lengths (from anterior to posterior: a1, a2, m, p2, p1), the most depressed point of superior EPFs was mostly at segment-a2 (approximately 45%), followed by segment-a1 (approximately 20%) or segment-m (approximately 20%), and very rarely at segment-p1. The upper 1/3 of anterior vertebral wall was more likely to fracture, followed by middle 1/3 of anterior wall. For posterior vertebral wall fracture, 68.5% broke the bony wall surrounding the basivertebral vain. 58.6%, 30.0%, and 11.4% of vertebral fractures had <1/5, 1/5–1/3, and >1/3 vertebral body height loss. As the extent of vertebral height loss increased, the chance of having both superior and inferior EPFs also increased; however, the chance of having inferior EPF alone did not increase. Conclusion Traumatic EPF features are characterized, which may help the differentiation of traumatic and osteoporotic EPFs.

Traumatic end plate fractures (EPFs) refers to the EPF caused by trauma, rather than the pathological status of the end plate (EP). However, some old traumatic EPFs may be mistaken as osteoporotic in the elderly. The objective of this study is to describe the radiological features of traumatic EPF in different traumatic fracture type patients presenting in the Emergency department setting. And to compare the result with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF). This study retrospectively analyzed the anatomical location of acute thoracolumbar vertebral traumatic EPFs in males (age≤55 years) and females (age≤50 years). The anatomic distribution of EPFs, the anterior and posterior wall fracture were analyzed in patients, who were scanned with 1 or more of the following methods: radiography, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging. There were 194 cases of acute spine trauma involving at least 1 EPF, including 118 males and 76 females. The involved vertebra was mostly at L1 (29.7%), followed by T12 (18.3%), and then by L2 (12.9%). Excluding those with both upper and lower EP involvements, the ratio of superior EPF to inferior EPF was 33.5 for males and 45.5 for females. With the EP divided into 5 segments of equal length in the anteroposterior direction in different fracture types, fractures occurred mostly at a2 segment (71.48% for superior EPs and 7.60% for inferior EPs), followed by a1 segment (66.16% for superior EPs). The upper third of the anterior and posterior walls were most prone to fracture in traumatic vertebral fracture. Traumatic EPFs more likely involve the anterior EP more than the posterior EP and is correlated with fracture type. These characteristics may help radiologist differential diagnosis between traumatic and osteoporotic EPF.

No abstract