Recent literature suggests that the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) for
rectal cancer patients might depend on the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT).
Aim was to evaluate whether the effect of aCT in rectal cancer is modified by response to
CRT and to identify which patients benefit from aCT after CRT, by means of a pooled
analysis of individual patient data from 13 datasets. Patients were categorised into 3
groups: pCR (ypT0N0), ypT1-2 tumour and ypT3-4 tumour. Hazard ratios for the effect of aCT
were derived from multivariable Cox regression analyses. Primary outcome measure was
recurrence-free survival (RFS). 1723(52%) of 3313 included patients received aCT. 898
patients had a pCR, 966 had a ypT1-2 tumour and 1302 had a ypT3-4 tumour. For 122 patients
response category was missing and 25 patients had ypT0N+. Median follow-up for all
patients was 51 (0-219) months. Hazard ratios for RFS with 95%CI for patients treated with
aCT were 1.25(0.68-2.29), 0.58(0.37-0.89) and 0.83(0.66-1.10) for patients with pCR,
ypT1-2 and ypT3-4 tumours, respectively. The effect of aCT in rectal cancer patients
treated with CRT differs between subgroups. Patients with a pCR after CRT may not benefit
from aCT, whereas patients with residual tumour had superior outcomes when aCT was
administered. The test for interaction did not reach statistical significance, but the
results support further investigation of a more individualized approach to administer aCT
after CRT and surgery based on pathologic staging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.